SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2007 2007
DOI: 10.1190/1.2792484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Azimuth decomposition of SBL data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of resistive targets on the field values is subtle in the MCSEM method. In order to make that effect more apparent it is customary to show the field magnitudes normalized by the data from a reference receiver, which supposedly is in a position where there is no influence of the resistive target (Røsten et al, 2003;Johnstad et al, 2005;Maaø et al, 2007). In theoretical studies this normalization is made with field values calculated for a model with a homogeneous earth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of resistive targets on the field values is subtle in the MCSEM method. In order to make that effect more apparent it is customary to show the field magnitudes normalized by the data from a reference receiver, which supposedly is in a position where there is no influence of the resistive target (Røsten et al, 2003;Johnstad et al, 2005;Maaø et al, 2007). In theoretical studies this normalization is made with field values calculated for a model with a homogeneous earth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing included an approximate up-down wavefield decomposition [9] and azimuth processing [10].…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposition of the CSEM response into radial and azimuthal components assumes a plane layer earth model (Maaø et al 2007). However, this assumption can be violated in azimuth decomposition for attribute analysis when the azimuth angle, θ, is less than 45° (Maaø et al 2007). Broadside data with short source‐receiver offsets, giving high azimuth angles (>45°) and smaller radial field components, are not comparable with the in‐line data.…”
Section: Azimuth Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%