2011
DOI: 10.1002/marc.201000687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Azide/Alkyne‐“Click”‐Reactions of Encapsulated Reagents: Toward Self‐Healing Materials

Abstract: The successful encapsulation of reactive components for the azide/alkyne-"click"-reaction is reported featuring for the first time the use of a liquid polymer as reactive component. A liquid, azido-telechelic three-arm star poly(isobutylene) (M(n) = 3900 g · mol⁻¹) as well as trivalent alkynes were encapsulated into micron-sized capsules and embedded into a polymer-matrix (high-molecular weight poly(isobutylene), M(n) = 250,000 g · mol⁻¹). Using (Cu(I)Br(PPh₃)₃) as catalyst for the azide/alkyne-"click"-reactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most common materials used for shell wall are polyureas [8][9][10], polyurethanes [3,11,12], melamine-formaldehyde [13][14][15] and ureaformaldehyde [2,16,17]. They can be obtained using different methods like in situ polymerization [2,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19], interfacial polymerization [3, 8-12, 20, 21], Pickering emulsion [22][23][24], microemulsion polymerization [25,26], solvent evaporation/ Fig. 1 Schematic of second-generation self-healing process: (1) coating with microcapsules before microcrack propagation, (2) microcracks occur, (3) microcapsules rupture and healing agent fills crack area, (4) healing agent reacts with water from environment and functional groups from matrix extraction [27,28] or sol-gel reaction [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most common materials used for shell wall are polyureas [8][9][10], polyurethanes [3,11,12], melamine-formaldehyde [13][14][15] and ureaformaldehyde [2,16,17]. They can be obtained using different methods like in situ polymerization [2,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19], interfacial polymerization [3, 8-12, 20, 21], Pickering emulsion [22][23][24], microemulsion polymerization [25,26], solvent evaporation/ Fig. 1 Schematic of second-generation self-healing process: (1) coating with microcapsules before microcrack propagation, (2) microcracks occur, (3) microcapsules rupture and healing agent fills crack area, (4) healing agent reacts with water from environment and functional groups from matrix extraction [27,28] or sol-gel reaction [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average maximal peak load to break the virgin sample is 58 N in the case of EPON 828, 80 N in the case of RIM (100:30), and 120 N in the case of RIM (100:50). It is clear that EPON 828 is an intrinsically weaker material than RIM (100: 30) and RIM (100:50). However, note that the high apparent strength of the RIM (100:50) arises from plastic deformation of the RIM material due to its relatively low T g (48 °C).…”
Section: Average Peak Load Vs Healing Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are the prevailing adopted techniques for designing self-healing polymers. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Among various healing techniques, covalent bond formation is undoubtedly the most efficient healing technique to ensure sufficient strength for long-term structural applications, as they are the strongest chemical bonds. Although numerous methods are available for making self-healing polymers a few of them leads to formation of covalent bond formation between healing agent and the matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%