2022
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/npvbz
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AYUSH interventions for COVID-19 - a living systematic review and meta-analysis [First report]

Abstract: BackgroundIn India, alternative and complementary therapies (AYUSH medicines) are utilized in COVID-19 management extensively. This study was planned to assess the prophylactic and therapeutic effectiveness of AYUSH interventions on COVID-19 through a living systematic review and meta-analysis approach.MethodsDifferent databases like Pubmed; the Cochrane central register of controlled trials; WHO COVID-19 database; the central trial registry - India; Digital Helpline for Ayurveda Research Articles and AYUSH re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viral Clearance: Add-on AYUSH Interventions vs. Standard Care Viral clearance was determined using polymerase chain reaction cutoff points in three randomized controlled trials (n=163) of supplementary AYUSH interventions [12]. The proportion of patients who received either AYUSH supplements or conventional therapy did not change significantly between the two groups [RR 1.19 (95% CI: 0.59 to 2.42)] or at 99 cases per 1,000 (from 214 reduced to 741 more).…”
Section: Figure 5 Chart Of Clinical Improvement [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral Clearance: Add-on AYUSH Interventions vs. Standard Care Viral clearance was determined using polymerase chain reaction cutoff points in three randomized controlled trials (n=163) of supplementary AYUSH interventions [12]. The proportion of patients who received either AYUSH supplements or conventional therapy did not change significantly between the two groups [RR 1.19 (95% CI: 0.59 to 2.42)] or at 99 cases per 1,000 (from 214 reduced to 741 more).…”
Section: Figure 5 Chart Of Clinical Improvement [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%