2016
DOI: 10.18037/ausbd.417424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aydınlatıcı Program Değerlendirme Modeli

Abstract: This study aims to introduce Illuminative Program Evaluation Model, which is one of the program evaluation models in education, has almost never been used in program evaluation studies so far, and about which Turkish resources are quite inadequate, thus contribute to the Turkish literature. Within this scope, first underlying paradigm and features of the Illuminative Evaluation Model as well as its aims were explained. Then, conceptual and methodological framework as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Gredler (1996) examined curriculum evaluation models under two headings as utilitarian and intuitionist/pluralist. Utilitarian evaluation approach provides quantitative data that will be useful to decision-makers and focuses on large groups such as the school district or the entire school (Özüdoğru & Adıgüzel, 2016). Examples of utilitarian evaluation approach are Provus's Discrepancy Evaluation Model, CIPP Model, Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model, and Goal-Free Evaluation Model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Gredler (1996) examined curriculum evaluation models under two headings as utilitarian and intuitionist/pluralist. Utilitarian evaluation approach provides quantitative data that will be useful to decision-makers and focuses on large groups such as the school district or the entire school (Özüdoğru & Adıgüzel, 2016). Examples of utilitarian evaluation approach are Provus's Discrepancy Evaluation Model, CIPP Model, Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model, and Goal-Free Evaluation Model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the evaluators seek to answer to the question, "How good is the curriculum?" and examine the content, order of content, learning experiences, and learning materials (Özüdoğru & Adıgüzel, 2016). This approach assumes that if the content of a curriculum is accurate and has a solid basis for its organization, students will effectively learn (Ornstein & Hunkins, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu potansiyelin daha iyi kullanılabilmesi ve MAÖL programlarının geliştirilebilmesi için programların sistematik olarak değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir. Değerlendirme, eğitim programının önemli ve devamlı bir yönünü meydana getirir ve bu süreçten elde edilen verilerle eğitim programının daha etkili hale getirilmesini sağlar (Özüdoğru ve Adıgüzel, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified