2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70465-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axitinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised open-label phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
209
2
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
209
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…126 The adverse events more commonly seen with axitinib (≥10% difference) than with sorafenib treatment were diarrhea, hypertension, weight loss, decreased appetite, dysphonia, hypothyroidism, and upper abdominal pain; adverse events more commonly seen with sorafenib treatment included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, rash, alopecia, and erythema. 126 The difference in PFS between patients treated with axitinib versus sorafenib is not statistically significant; however, the results demonstrated clinical activity of axitinib with acceptable toxicity profile in the first-line setting.…”
Section: Axitinib As First-line Therapy For Predominantlymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…126 The adverse events more commonly seen with axitinib (≥10% difference) than with sorafenib treatment were diarrhea, hypertension, weight loss, decreased appetite, dysphonia, hypothyroidism, and upper abdominal pain; adverse events more commonly seen with sorafenib treatment included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, rash, alopecia, and erythema. 126 The difference in PFS between patients treated with axitinib versus sorafenib is not statistically significant; however, the results demonstrated clinical activity of axitinib with acceptable toxicity profile in the first-line setting.…”
Section: Axitinib As First-line Therapy For Predominantlymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To determine whether this holds true in the first-line setting, a randomized, open-label, phase III trial was conducted in newly diagnosed patients randomized (2:1) to receive axitinib (5 mg twice daily) or sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). 126 The median PFS seen in patients treated with axitinib was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.2-12.1) and for those treated with sorafenib was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.7-8.3). 126 The adverse events more commonly seen with axitinib (≥10% difference) than with sorafenib treatment were diarrhea, hypertension, weight loss, decreased appetite, dysphonia, hypothyroidism, and upper abdominal pain; adverse events more commonly seen with sorafenib treatment included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, rash, alopecia, and erythema.…”
Section: Axitinib As First-line Therapy For Predominantlymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Accordingly, it was postulated that the universal, early loss of VHL would render ccRCC susceptible to the inhibition of the VEGF signaling pathway (39). Indeed, the mainstream treatment for metastatic ccRCC encompasses antibody against VEGF or inhibitors of VEGFR, such as bevacizumab (40,41), sorafenib (42,43), sunitinib (44,45), pazopanib (46,47), and axitinib (48,49). However, the complete functional loss of VHL alone was Genomic studies have linked mTORC1 pathway-activating mutations with exceptional response to treatment with allosteric inhibitors of mTORC1 called rapalogs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serious treatment-related adverse events included atrial flutter, cardiac arrest, MI, asthenia, aorto-duodenal fistula and hypertensive crisis < 1% each (1 patient). Besides, 1 patient in the axitinib group died of treatment-related cardiac arrest [65].…”
Section: Axitinibmentioning
confidence: 99%