1971
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1971.38.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axiomatic convexity theory and relationships between the Carathéodory, Helly, and Radon numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above result is a generalization of the Kay and Womble inequality [10] and was also presented by the author at the 1976 Oberwolfach Conference.…”
Section: Robert E Jamison-waldnersupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The above result is a generalization of the Kay and Womble inequality [10] and was also presented by the author at the 1976 Oberwolfach Conference.…”
Section: Robert E Jamison-waldnersupporting
confidence: 56%
“…PROOF: To show (a) we first notice the following simple consequence of the Lemma: The proof of (b) is also straightforward. D [3] Helly and Radon numbers 431…”
Section: Convexity Parameters For Substructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…430 K. Kolodziejczyk [2] The (generalised) Helly and Radon numbers play a very important part in the theory of axiomatic convexity and combinatorial geometry. The numbers, their properties and relationships have been investigated in many papers; see, among others, [1,2,3,4,5,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing notations and definitions have been taken from [3], [4] and, in particular, from [8]. Let ^ be a collection of subsets of a set 1; by Π^7 and U ^ we denote the intersection and the union respectivily, of the elements of ^.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, if the exchange-number e of the convexity-structure & for X exists then e ^ 1; if ^ is a TΊ-convexity-structure (see [4]) then e^2; if id, |A|^e and pe 9f(A) then %? (A) = \J{^(PV(A\a))\ae A}, see [5], axiom C3; if the Caratheodory-number c of ^ exists too, then e <^ c + 1, which follows directly from Lemma 2.1(ii).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%