2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axiomatic characterizations under players nullification

Abstract: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of CRESE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ultimate argument in favor of NEL is that NEL implies the following axiom: Balanced cycle contributions under nullification, BCyCN. (Béal et al, 2016)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An ultimate argument in favor of NEL is that NEL implies the following axiom: Balanced cycle contributions under nullification, BCyCN. (Béal et al, 2016)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These terms are equal if NEL is invoked. BCyCN is an interesting and very weak axiom as, following (Béal et al, 2016), any linear symmetric value satisfies it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Separatorization 1 refers to a player's obstruction of cooperation in the sense that the worth of any coalition containing him equals the sum of the stand-alone worths of the players in this coalition, while the worth of any coalition without this player remains unchanged. This is not to be confused with dummification as introduced in Béal et al (2018) (strengthening nullification studied in, e.g., Gómez-Rúa and Vidal-Puga (2010); Béal et al (2016b); Ferrières (2017)), where a player becomes a dummy player. The first axiom, called proportional loss under separatorization, requires that if a player becomes a separator, then all other player's payoff change in proportion to their stand-alone worths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another version of balanced collective contributions is examined in Béal et al . (), where the subgame induced by the departure of an agent is replaced by the game obtained after the nullification of this agent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%