1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-7404(96)80020-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axillary lymphadenectomy—just how radical should it be?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several studies in which a median (or mean) of >10 lymph nodes was examined also show an association with survival, even though there should be fewer patients understaged in these studies [25,37]. The negative studies are no more helpful in elucidating the cause of this relationship, as the number of nodes excised varies greatly [31,34,35,38]. For patients with positive lymph nodes, a therapeutic benefit from a more extensive axillary dissection leading to improved survival or recurrence makes biologic sense, but again the evidence for a causal relationship is conflicting [16,25,29,31,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, several studies in which a median (or mean) of >10 lymph nodes was examined also show an association with survival, even though there should be fewer patients understaged in these studies [25,37]. The negative studies are no more helpful in elucidating the cause of this relationship, as the number of nodes excised varies greatly [31,34,35,38]. For patients with positive lymph nodes, a therapeutic benefit from a more extensive axillary dissection leading to improved survival or recurrence makes biologic sense, but again the evidence for a causal relationship is conflicting [16,25,29,31,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult to distinguish the role of the surgeon and the extent of dissection from these possible confounding variables in this retrospective study. However, the number of lymph nodes examined has been used as a surrogate measure for the extent of axillary dissection in many studies [22,25,[28][29][30][31][32]34,35,37] and is considered acceptable for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 This effect seems to disappear when a more complete dissection is performed. 13 The inclusion of level III nodes in an axillary dissection for a clinically negative axilla rarely provides additional staging information because the occurrence of ‘skip’ metastases (metastases that do not also involve lower echelon nodes) is exceedingly unusual (< 0.5%). 14 In patients with clinically involved nodes, excision of all axillary lymph nodes, including Rotter’s (interpectoral nodes) nodes, might be expected to improve local control although there is no information available to confirm this supposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%