2015
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axially Loaded Reinforced Concrete Columns with a Square Section Partially Confined by Light GFRP Straps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant enhancement of the strength, as well as the ductility for the GFRP-SR confined cylinders, was achieved by increasing the thickness of GFRP tubes and the volumetric ratio of SR. For example, the average compressive strength obtained for specimens P1S2 and P2S1 were 70.95 MPa and 109.71 MPa, respectively, whereas the average ultimate compressive strain determined for specimens P1S2 and P2S1 were 0.0222 and 0.0244, respectively. The ultimate condition shown in Table 3 was dominated by the rupture of the GFRP tube and the rupture of GFRP in specimens with higher volumetric SR ratio, which corresponded to larger axial compressive strength and strain, as reported also by Lee et al [34]. The concrete ultimate axial strains (εcu) corresponding to failure varied widely from 0.0222 to 0.03, with a tendency to increase for specimens with more GFRP layers and higher SR volumetric ratio.…”
Section: Residual Compressive Behavior Of Confined Concrete After Rupsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant enhancement of the strength, as well as the ductility for the GFRP-SR confined cylinders, was achieved by increasing the thickness of GFRP tubes and the volumetric ratio of SR. For example, the average compressive strength obtained for specimens P1S2 and P2S1 were 70.95 MPa and 109.71 MPa, respectively, whereas the average ultimate compressive strain determined for specimens P1S2 and P2S1 were 0.0222 and 0.0244, respectively. The ultimate condition shown in Table 3 was dominated by the rupture of the GFRP tube and the rupture of GFRP in specimens with higher volumetric SR ratio, which corresponded to larger axial compressive strength and strain, as reported also by Lee et al [34]. The concrete ultimate axial strains (εcu) corresponding to failure varied widely from 0.0222 to 0.03, with a tendency to increase for specimens with more GFRP layers and higher SR volumetric ratio.…”
Section: Residual Compressive Behavior Of Confined Concrete After Rupsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The final failure of FRP-confined concrete corresponding to the rupture of FRP is very sudden and explosive because of the linear elastic tensile stress-strain behavior of FRP, thus, relatively high compression strength as well as high ductility are expected for concrete under combined FRP-SR confinement, i.e., in FRP-SR confined concrete. Few tests have been performed to investigate the behavior of concrete confined with both transverse steel reinforcement (TSR) and FRP [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Moreover, most of these tests were conducted to examine the performance of FRP jackets in retrofitting existing reinforced concrete (RC) columns that contained small amounts of TSR, which did not influence the behavior of FRP confined concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental studies reported that external wrapping by FRP composite could remarkably increase the load-carrying ability of circular, square, and rectangular concrete columns [5][6][7]. Different types of FRPs have been used for the lateral confinement of concrete columns, which includes carbon [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], glass [7,[15][16][17][18], aramid [6,[19][20][21], polyethylene napthalate (PEN) [22,23], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [22][23][24][25][26], and basalt [27][28][29]. These FRP composites are effectively used in enhancing the load-bearing capacity and energy absorption of masonry and reinforced concrete infrastructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good bonds are essential for the effectiveness of the composite action between the FRP and the concrete structure. In the case of non bond-critical applications such as confinement, with or without the use of resin [7], bonding is generally not of significance, but the weather durability of the FRP is still a major concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%