2015
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.159876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial length and cone density as assessed with adaptive optics in myopia

Abstract: Aim:To assess the variations in cone mosaic in myopia and its correlation with axial length (AL).Subjects and Methods:Twenty-five healthy myopic volunteers underwent assessment of photoreceptors using adaptive optics retinal camera at 2° and 3° from the foveal center in four quadrants superior, inferior, temporal and nasal. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 17 (IBM). Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to study the relation between cone density and AL, quadrant around the fovea and eccentricity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the variability in retinal structure, we also found a large range in axial length across our sample, with longer eyes being associated with lower cone density. Although this trend is in agreement with previous AO literature in the case of the diseased retina, 56 58 the relationship between axial length and cone density cannot be attributed to retinal stretching alone. Whereas myopia was considered previously to be one of the defining characteristics of BED, 1 , 3 5 many of our subjects were not myopic, having little or no refractive error while still having mosaic disruption; though this was observed in LIAVA, but not LVAVA, subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition to the variability in retinal structure, we also found a large range in axial length across our sample, with longer eyes being associated with lower cone density. Although this trend is in agreement with previous AO literature in the case of the diseased retina, 56 58 the relationship between axial length and cone density cannot be attributed to retinal stretching alone. Whereas myopia was considered previously to be one of the defining characteristics of BED, 1 , 3 5 many of our subjects were not myopic, having little or no refractive error while still having mosaic disruption; though this was observed in LIAVA, but not LVAVA, subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, even if all experiments show a negative correlation between cone density (cone/mm 2 ) and axial length, the level of correlation (i.e. r 2 ) differs remarkably, it ranged from 0.14 [ 8 ] or 0.16 [ 19 ] to 0.40 [ 23 ] or 0.56 [ 5 ] at an eccentricity of 2° or 3° and even 0.75 [ 6 ] at 1° of eccentricity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is the role of the axial length (AL) on cone density expressed in metric units that should be clarified. Indeed, some authors found an important correlation (r 2 = 0.56 at 3°, 0.37 at 5° and 0.23 at 7° [ 5 ]; r 2 = 0.40 at 2° [ 23 ]; r 2 = 0.75 at 1° [ 6 ]) while others found low correlation (r 2 = 0.14 at ~2°, 0.022 at 3° and 0.037 at 5° [ 8 ]; r 2 = 0.16 at 2° and 0.14 at 3° [ 19 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the optical refractive error of myopia can be corrected using spectacles or contact lenses, the axial elongation of the myopic eye can markedly increase the risk of sight-threatening conditions such as retinal detachment 1 , glaucoma 2 , and myopic macular degeneration 3 . In the absence of such pathological processes it has also been demonstrated that the globe elongation that occurs in myopia can lead to secondary peripheral retinal thinning 4 6 , in addition to a reduction in the density of both photoreceptors 7 9 and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) 10 , 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%