2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial grazing collisions with insulator surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It takes into account the energy lost by the atom along the classical trajectory but without including effects of quantum coherence. The influence of quantum interferences in the projectile energy-loss spectrum is expected to be minor because, even for insulator surfaces, where valence electrons are tighter than for metals, coherence quantum effects are completely washed out when partial contributions coming from different initial crystal states are added to obtain the transition probability to a given final state [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes into account the energy lost by the atom along the classical trajectory but without including effects of quantum coherence. The influence of quantum interferences in the projectile energy-loss spectrum is expected to be minor because, even for insulator surfaces, where valence electrons are tighter than for metals, coherence quantum effects are completely washed out when partial contributions coming from different initial crystal states are added to obtain the transition probability to a given final state [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wave functions ϕ i corresponding to the different subshells of the negative fluor ion were represented by Hartree-Fock wave functions for negative ions [37], and no correction was included in ϕ i to take into account the interaction of the target anion with nearest neighbors. The effective hole charge was chosen as z T = n i (−2 (at) i ) 1/2 [31,38], where n i is the principal quantum number of the atomic state ϕ i . The 2s-and 2p-bandwidths of fluor were estimated as 1.6 and 5.0 eV, respectively [39].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) it is possible to interpret the process as a collection of individual transitions from different lattice sites R. We assume that when the electron e is ionized from a region close to the R site, the charge of passive electrons fully screens the other ionic centers, but the hole left by the emitted electron is not instantaneously filled up as in metals, remaining in the exit channel [31]. Note that this effect is similar to the one giving rise to the track potential in the case of electron emission by projectile impact [16,32,33].…”
Section: A Csv Transition Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider that the experimental value of the total electron yield is about 60 [34], taking into account that most of the F − @ excitons might decay producing secondary electrons, these values of the exciton production would represent a considerable contribution to the electron emission probability. In practice, we have to consider that the number of excitons could be larger than the primary one calculated here because additional secondary excitons might be produced by primary ejected electrons colliding with F − @ targets.…”
Section: -9mentioning
confidence: 99%