2019
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Axial Displacement in Cement-Retained Prostheses with Different Implant-Abutment Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the studies related to axial displacement [1][2][3] are on the magnitude of tightening torque and the duration of cyclic loading, and few studies have applied with static loading. Ko et al [4] reported that axial displacement and reverse torque loss occurred at significantly low levels after the cyclic and static loading in the case of wide-type implants of 5.0 mm diameter. In addition, the CAD/CAM (Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing) customized abutments, which are currently in the spotlight, may show differences in the fabricating process from the stock abutments produced by manufacturers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the studies related to axial displacement [1][2][3] are on the magnitude of tightening torque and the duration of cyclic loading, and few studies have applied with static loading. Ko et al [4] reported that axial displacement and reverse torque loss occurred at significantly low levels after the cyclic and static loading in the case of wide-type implants of 5.0 mm diameter. In addition, the CAD/CAM (Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing) customized abutments, which are currently in the spotlight, may show differences in the fabricating process from the stock abutments produced by manufacturers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts have been made to understand the factors that could compromise the settling effect of different implant abutment connections [1,2]. Various implant elements including the implant-abutment interface, the types of abutments, the screw characteristics, and the cyclic loading condition have all been shown to influence settling into implants and a loss of preload [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, most studies dealing with axial displacement do this during cyclic loads [ 30 , 43 ] and few studies have dealt with static loading. Ko et al [ 44 ] reported that axial displacement and removal force dramatically decrease as a result of cyclic loading. Furthermore, the very common use of customized abutments in dentistry made with computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM), showed differences during axial loads, probably related to the different production techniques of the abutments themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though this digital method can overcome the challenge of occlusal changes in the initial period after the delivery of restorations, a reliable connection between the implant and abutment should be confirmed to decrease the axial displacement of the abutment under functional loading [10,12,26]. The implant screw must be tightened with adequate torque to achieve the optimum preload [12,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible reasons for the changes in occlusion following the prosthetic restoration of the posterior area. First, the prosthesis sinking phenomenon can be caused by the loading applied to the implant-abutment connection in clinical practice [9,10]. The micro-roughness and irregularity of the surface at the connection of the implant and abutment can get flattened by the torque tightening, resulting in a reduced distance between the contacting surfaces [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%