2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2020.102871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ax-Schanuel and strong minimality for the j-function

Abstract: Let K := (K; +, •, D, 0, 1) be a differentially closed field of characteristic 0 with field of constants C.In the first part of the paper we explore the connection between Ax-Schanuel type theorems (predimension inequalities) for a differential equation E(x, y) and the geometry of the fibres U s := {y : E(s, y) ∧ y / ∈ C} where s is a non-constant element. We show that certain types of predimension inequalities imply strong minimality and geometric triviality of U s . Moreover, the induced structure on the Car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When dim(Y ) = 1, this corresponds to the assumption that one only considers non-constant solutions. (2) Using Lemma 5.1 (2) for any υ ∈ Y , we have that tr.deg. C( t) C( t) υ = k. Hence it also follows that tr.deg.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When dim(Y ) = 1, this corresponds to the assumption that one only considers non-constant solutions. (2) Using Lemma 5.1 (2) for any υ ∈ Y , we have that tr.deg. C( t) C( t) υ = k. Hence it also follows that tr.deg.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, y k ∈ K υ are algebraically independent over K then they are algebraically independent over F . (2) We say that tp(υ/K) has U -rank 1 (or is minimal) if and only if υ ∈ K alg but every forking extension of tp(υ/K) is algebraic, that is has only finitely many realizations.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result ultimately relies on point-counting and o-minimality via the Pila–Wilkie theorem as applied in [Pil11, Pil13]; the argument there is very specific to the third order nonlinear differential equation satisfied by the -function. Later, Aslanyan [Asl20] produced another proof, ultimately relying on similar (stronger) inputs of [PT16]. Casale et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%