2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0032247416000516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Awkward Antarctic nationalism’: bodies, ice cores and gateways in and beyond Australian Antarctic Territory/East Antarctica

Abstract: This paper explores ‘awkward Antarctic nationalism’ and builds on the critical scholarship that explores the contours and contradictions of everyday, mundane, banal and even hot polar nationalisms. The emphasis on ‘awkward’ is designed to draw attention to the resonances and affordances that are associated with Australian polar nationalism in and beyond the Australian Antarctic Territory/East Antarctica. Using the 2016Australian Antarctic strategy: 20 year action planas a starting point, it considers how bodie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such trends have broad implications, but especially in relation to national policies on regional development with different sectoral approaches involving not only tourism but also other conventional and potential industries, such as mining, which may share transport and other infrastructure with tourism [127]. Thus, future research will need to address the political dynamics and socioeconomic interests stemming from polar and sub-polar governance and longstanding competition between gateways [128][129][130].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such trends have broad implications, but especially in relation to national policies on regional development with different sectoral approaches involving not only tourism but also other conventional and potential industries, such as mining, which may share transport and other infrastructure with tourism [127]. Thus, future research will need to address the political dynamics and socioeconomic interests stemming from polar and sub-polar governance and longstanding competition between gateways [128][129][130].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the decades since, the label "gateway city" has been applied in numerous contexts, including in relation to immigrant gateway cities, which serve as points of entrance for migrants to the surrounding country (Knapp & Vojnovic, 2016); trade gateway cities, which provide entrance points for domestic and international commerce to an economic region (Huff, 2012); and nature gateway cities, which offer tourist point of entry to nature-based attractions such as national parks and remote areas (Line & Costen, 2017). There are gateway cities all around the world, from Jackson, Wyoming, to Rajin-Seonbong, North Korea (Jo & Ducruet, 2007;Line & Costen, 2017), but a substantial subset of the literature focuses specifically on polar, and particularly Antarctic, gateways (Dodds, 2017;Dodds & Salazar, 2021;Elzinga, 2013;Hall, 2000Hall, , 2015Leane, 2016;Leane et al, 2016;Montsion, 2015;Muir et al, 2007;Nielsen et al, 2019;Salazar, 2013).…”
Section: Key Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Southern Rim cities can be understood not only as gateways but also as gatekeepers (Dodds, 2017;Dodds & Salazar, 2021), in the sense that, as global urban assemblages, they provide their own nationals and those from afar with access to the internationally governed spaces of the southernmost continent, controlling the flows of both goods and people to and from a region that is among the most inaccessible in the world. Occasionally, the politics of this gatekeeper function become explicit.…”
Section: Key Insightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Dodds has posited in relation to Australian Antarctic nationalism, these kinds of elements and the 'stories' that are embedded within them become significant in the doing of 'sovereignty labour'. 5 They can forge connections with/between territories and have the capacity to affect national citizenries, in ways that can engender emotional associations with territories. The affective registers of the elemental encountered in the everyday, then, can work to generate and sustain popular support for territorial claims stated within national constitutions and complex scientific submissions made by national governments to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%