2007
DOI: 10.1556/aling.54.2007.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awareness of second language inflectional morphology: A case study on Finnish as a second language

Abstract: Abstract:The Finnish language has a very extensive inflectional morphology, whereas Vietnamese, as an isolating language, has no inflection at all. Therefore, the major challenge encountered by Vietnamese immigrants learning Finnish is to develop awareness of the existence, function and use of inflection. This paper examines how this process manifests itself in native-non-native speaker (NS-NNS) conversations during the initial stages of second language acquisition. All the negotiation sequences including over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finnish is an agglutinative language with an extensive inflectional morphology, which means that the endings and suffixes of words are significant in meaningmaking and understanding (Suni 2007(Suni : 221, 2008. Kifibin mentions two different cases (the elative and the allative case) as targets of learning.…”
Section: Interaction With Significant Others At the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finnish is an agglutinative language with an extensive inflectional morphology, which means that the endings and suffixes of words are significant in meaningmaking and understanding (Suni 2007(Suni : 221, 2008. Kifibin mentions two different cases (the elative and the allative case) as targets of learning.…”
Section: Interaction With Significant Others At the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also object marking was analyzed, and there was a preference for marking de niteness over inde niteness. Suni (2007; has analyzed how Vietnamese learners of Finnish start to process receptively the in ectional morphology of Finnish in interaction. eir growing awareness of in ection is clearly re ected in their repetition practices, and the key nding is that receptive segmenting of in ectional morphology is a prerequisite for the productive use of it, when the rst language of the learner is an isolating one.…”
Section: Forms and Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly more research is needed to understand how students in FLH provide and receive input and feedback from their peers, what kinds of error correction and help they give to each other, and what type of comprehensible input is given. FLH may provide both the benefits of interacting with an NS (Suni, 2007) and with NNSs (Varonis & Gass, 1985) and demonstrates that conversing with NNSs provides adequate input and interaction to help students of different types of L2s and proficiency levels to improve their language skills.…”
Section: Flh and Type Of Studentmentioning
confidence: 99%