2002
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awareness of environmental risks and protective actions among minority women in Northern Manhattan.

Abstract: We report findings of a survey of 555 women 18-35 years of age living in Northern Manhattan in New York City. The survey was conducted by the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health (CCCEH) to learn what community women knew about environmental risks to health and what they did to protect themselves and their families, to validate the findings of focus groups held with community women, and to provide information for planning the Healthy Home, Healthy Child campaign sponsored by CCCEH. Survey findin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, Evans et al (2002) in their study of visible minority women in New York found that most participants reported high levels of awareness of environmental risks (>95% for most identified hazards) and a similarly high percentage reported taking one or more protective actions to reduce identified exposures. The difference in findings may be explained in part by the fact that specific environmental hazards were introduced in their questionnaire, whereas in our study they were not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparison, Evans et al (2002) in their study of visible minority women in New York found that most participants reported high levels of awareness of environmental risks (>95% for most identified hazards) and a similarly high percentage reported taking one or more protective actions to reduce identified exposures. The difference in findings may be explained in part by the fact that specific environmental hazards were introduced in their questionnaire, whereas in our study they were not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…One exception is a study by Evans et al (2002) examining visible minority women's awareness of environmental health risks and protective actions in New York City. Using a questionnaire asking about specific environmental risks, including lead and pesticides, and precautions taken to reduce these risks, findings include high levels of awareness for most identified hazards (>95%), and similarly high levels of precautionary actions.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 A number of housing characteristics, including floor level, presence of pests, and dampness have been associated with psychological distress, poor mental health, and lower perceived health status. [28][29][30] Noise exposure in and around housing has been associated with increased cortisol levels and higher perceived stress.…”
Section: Linking Housing Characteristics and Psychological Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among New York City residents, Galea et al reported that, living in a neighbourhood characterised by a poor-quality built environment (both internal and external) is associated with a greater likelihood of depression, even after accounting for individual-level socio-demographic factors and neighbourhood-level income 8. More specifically, increased noise levels in the home have been associated with higher perceived stress and increased cortisol levels,11 presence of mold dampness and the inability to keep the house warm have all been associated with both asthma symptoms and distress outcomes,2 12 13 and housing instability has been associated both with increased allergen levels such as cockroaches and dust, and with higher distress symptoms 9 14. It has been hypothesised that these associations can be explained by a lack of control over our living environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%