SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Se
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.2003.1243931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awareness in human-robot interactions

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
126
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
126
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is referred to as Human-Robot Interaction Awareness. Formally, Drury et al [29] defines HRI awareness as the understanding that the human has of a robot's location, activities, status, and surroundings; the knowledge that the robot has of the human's commands or instructions that are necessary to direct its activities and the knowledge of the conditions and constraints under which the robot must operate. However, the lack of awareness significantly reduces the level of interaction between a human and a robot and thus the performance of the overall task required to be carried by both the human and the robot is greatly reduced [30].…”
Section:  Remote Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is referred to as Human-Robot Interaction Awareness. Formally, Drury et al [29] defines HRI awareness as the understanding that the human has of a robot's location, activities, status, and surroundings; the knowledge that the robot has of the human's commands or instructions that are necessary to direct its activities and the knowledge of the conditions and constraints under which the robot must operate. However, the lack of awareness significantly reduces the level of interaction between a human and a robot and thus the performance of the overall task required to be carried by both the human and the robot is greatly reduced [30].…”
Section:  Remote Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HRI studies have revealed that users of USAR human-robot systems spend too much time trying to gain situation awareness, which detracts from the task of finding victims [1,5,6]. Most of the dozen USAR interfaces we have studied do not convey essential information in an intuitive fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, most USAR robots that are sent into disaster zones are teleoperated. For this application, operators must have a good awareness of their surroundings, yet it is difficult to obtain situation awareness [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have performed studies on more than a dozen USAR interfaces used in the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) and RoboCup Robot Rescue competitions and have also done usability testing with domain experts at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (see, for example, [1], [2] and [3]). These studies allowed us to identify the successes and failures of different interfaces, and we have developed guidelines for the effective design of interfaces for human-robot interaction in a USAR application [4]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%