Awareness During Resuscitation - II: A Multi-Center Study of Consciousness and Awareness in Cardiac Arrest

Parnia, Sam; Shirazi, Tara Keshavarz; Patel, Jignesh; Tran, Laurie; Sinha, Niraj; Caitlin, O&apos;Neill; Roellke, Emma; Mengotto, Amanda; Findlay, Shannon; McBrine, Michael; Spiegel, Rebecca; Tarpey, Thaddeus; Huppert, Elise; Jaffe, Ian; Gonzales, Anelly M.; Xu, Jing; Koopman, Emmeline; Perkins, Gavin D; Vuylsteke, Alain; Bloom, Ben; Jarman, Heather; Tong, Hiu Nam; Chan, Louisa; Michael, Lyaker; Thomas, Matthew; Velchev, Veselin; Cairns, Charles B.; Sharma, Rahul; Kulstad, Erik; Schrerer, Elizabeth; O&apos;Keeffe, Terence; Foroozesh, Mahtab; Abe, Olumayowa; Ogedegbe, Chinwe; Girgis, Amira; Pradhan, Deepak; Deakin, Charles D.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4246760

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1,5 However, in our first round, out of 306 responses, 82.4% (n = 252) had managed a CPR-Induced Consciousness presentation. The discrepancy between reported CPR-Induced Consciousness events in the registry studies and cross-sectional surveys has previously been demonstrated 3,37 clearly the need for rigorous data collection and epidemiological research to establish a more accurate prevalence figure is required.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Development of an international prehospital CPR-induced consciousness guideline: A Delphi study

Howard,

Grusd,

Rice

et al. 2023

Paramedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Improved prehospital systems are contributing to increased presentations of CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC). Data registries do not report CPRIC presentations and thus continued lack of evidence exists, causing a significant variation of prehospital CPRIC management guidelines. The result is variation in recognizing and managing CPRIC. Steps are needed to improve knowledge of CPRIC and model evidence-based guidelines. Objective An international panel of experts was recruited to create CPRIC definitions, guidelines, and a reporting framework which can be used for reporting purposes. Methods A Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement rate, on three domains or areas of interest: Definition, management guideline and data reporting. Participants were invited from the author's professional organizations, as well as social media outlets to recruit as many international clinicians as possible. The study administered four rounds of online surveys. Each round had multiple consensus statements for participants to respond to. Results Eighty-two percent of panelists reported seeing or managing CPRIC suggesting either improved awareness or increased exposure. Consensus was achieved in all three domains. There was agreement on a clear definition of CPRIC. The panel developed two subgroups of CPRIC; interfering and non-interfering CPRIC. Ketamine was the preferred choice to treat CPRIC. Panelists overwhelmingly felt CPRIC needed to be included into the Utstein guidelines. Conclusions This study successfully created definitions of CPRIC, management guidelines, and a data reporting framework. Using this study as a building block, the study team hopes stronger, evidence-based guidelines can now be researched and published.

show abstract