2019
DOI: 10.1002/bit.27199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awakening dormant glycosyltransferases in CHO cells with CRISPRa

Abstract: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are the preferred workhorse for the biopharmaceutical industry, and CRISPR/Cas9 has proven powerful for generating targeted gene perturbations in CHO cells. Here, we expand the CRISPR engineering toolbox with CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) to increase transcription of endogenous genes. We successfully increased transcription of Mgat3 and St6gal1, and verified their activity on a functional level by subsequently detecting that the appropriate glycan structures were produced. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dramatically lowered HCP ppm values during purification of a mAb will facilitate downstream processes. These HCP-reduced knockouts can be combined with additional advantageous genetic modifications, such as the production of glycoengineered proteins [15][16][17][18] , higher viability during long culture times 19 , viral resistance or elimination [20][21][22] , and/or clones with higher protein production stability of mAbs 23 , to create predictable upstream and downstream processes with full control over critical process parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dramatically lowered HCP ppm values during purification of a mAb will facilitate downstream processes. These HCP-reduced knockouts can be combined with additional advantageous genetic modifications, such as the production of glycoengineered proteins [15][16][17][18] , higher viability during long culture times 19 , viral resistance or elimination [20][21][22] , and/or clones with higher protein production stability of mAbs 23 , to create predictable upstream and downstream processes with full control over critical process parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As chromatin states are defined by their histone modification patterns which in turn interact with DNA methylation (Du, Johnson, Jacobsen, & Patel, 2015; Zhao et al, 2016), the random epigenetic modulation applied in this study could also result in subtle changes in the chromatin states surrounding the integration site, thus enhancing transcription. Others have used tools for targeted alterations of histone modifications or for attracting transcription factors to enhance gene expression (Karottki et al, 2020). However, these changes are transient and in effect only for as long as the corresponding “writer” is active and provided to cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus one can rationally and reversibly switch on or off the expression of endogenous genes solely by changing the promoter DNA methylation of the target region (Marx et al, 2018; Morita et al, 2016; O'Geen et al, 2017). While many other approaches, such as the targeting of transcription factors (Agne et al, 2014; Karottki et al, 2020) typically are transient, changes in DNA methylation are maintained and inherited by progeny cells over many generations (Marx et al, 2018). The main limitation of this approach is that only genes with an already known impact on productivity or phenotype and only a limited number of genes can be targeted and the effect of targeting promoter regions is predominantly on/off, but does not achieve fine tuning of expression levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods mainly use gene knockout, knockdown, knock-in, overexpression, mutation, or small molecule suppression technologies to change the type and concentration of glycosidases and glycosyltransferases that are available inside these cells, thereby changing the glycosylation patterns of interested proteins expressed in them. Recent advances in gene editing tools, especially the CRISPR/Cas9 system, has enabled more rapid and cost-effective cell glycoengineering (Chan et al, 2016 ; Chung et al, 2017 ; Mabashi-Asazuma and Jarvis, 2017 ; Jansing et al, 2019 ; Karottki et al, 2020 ). Currently, the most widely used cells for protein glycoengineering are mammalian cells.…”
Section: Cell-based Protein Glycoengineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%