2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Awake Craniotomy in Low-Resource Settings: Findings from a Retrospective Cohort in the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 In a prospective cohort study from France of 374 patients who underwent awake craniotomy for an intra-axial supratentorial cerebral lesion from 2009 to 2014, only 3.4% or 13 patients had intraoperative partial seizures, and none of the procedures were considered as failed awake craniotomy. 25 In a retrospective descriptive study done in the Philippines from 2010 to 2019, 65 patients underwent awake craniotomy, most commonly for tumor excision. 25 The SAA technique was selected in most patients (67.7%) and the SAS technique in the remaining (32.3%).…”
Section: Review Of Anesthetic and Surgical Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…24 In a prospective cohort study from France of 374 patients who underwent awake craniotomy for an intra-axial supratentorial cerebral lesion from 2009 to 2014, only 3.4% or 13 patients had intraoperative partial seizures, and none of the procedures were considered as failed awake craniotomy. 25 In a retrospective descriptive study done in the Philippines from 2010 to 2019, 65 patients underwent awake craniotomy, most commonly for tumor excision. 25 The SAA technique was selected in most patients (67.7%) and the SAS technique in the remaining (32.3%).…”
Section: Review Of Anesthetic and Surgical Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In a retrospective descriptive study done in the Philippines from 2010 to 2019, 65 patients underwent awake craniotomy, most commonly for tumor excision. 25 The SAA technique was selected in most patients (67.7%) and the SAS technique in the remaining (32.3%). Of the 65 cases, no surgery was aborted.…”
Section: Review Of Anesthetic and Surgical Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…La técnica ideal dependerá del tipo de paciente y de la experiencia del neuroanestesiólogo [14]. Una vez que durante la valoración preanestésica se asegura que el paciente no cumple con los criterios de exclusión mayores como es la negativa del paciente al procedimiento y criterios de exclusión menores los cuales incluyen obesidad con IMC > 38, presencia de síndrome de apnea obstructiva del sueño (SAOS) entre otros [15].…”
Section: Técnica Anestésicaunclassified