2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2022.3193807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

aVsIs: An Analytical-Solution-Based Solver for Model-Predictive Control With Hexagonal Constraints in Voltage-Source Inverter Applications

Abstract: The theory of a new analytical-solution-based algorithm for calculating the optimal solution in model-predictive control applications with hexagonal constraints is discussed in this article. Three-phase voltage-source inverters for power electronic and electric motor drive applications are the target of the proposed method. The indirect model-predictive control requires a constrained quadratic programming (QP) solver to calculate the optimal solution. Most of the QP solvers use numerical algorithms, which may … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A three-phase voltage inverter is considered. In order to obtain a feasible voltage vector u k+1 dq , the hexagonal constraint in the dq current plane is implemented as linear inequality constraints [26], [31], [32]. Matrices M and m in (8) are defined as…”
Section: A Voltage and Current Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-phase voltage inverter is considered. In order to obtain a feasible voltage vector u k+1 dq , the hexagonal constraint in the dq current plane is implemented as linear inequality constraints [26], [31], [32]. Matrices M and m in (8) are defined as…”
Section: A Voltage and Current Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain a feasible voltage vector u k+1 dq , the hexagonal constraint in the dq current plane are implemented as linear inequality constraints [18], [22], [23]. Matrices M and m in (8) are defined as:…”
Section: A Voltage and Current Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gradient methods [31,142] and active-set methods [143] are the two most commonly used QP solver techniques for electrical drives. It should be noted that most of the QP solvers apply an iterative numerical method, which can drastically increase the computational load [144]. Paper [31] proposes an iteration scheme with a fixed number of steps for IPMSM drives using a nonlinear dq model, which takes into account the saturation and parasitic effects.…”
Section: Voltage Source Invertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An MPC scheme for PMSMs using the active-set method and implemented on low-performance hardware is presented in [143]. A computationally efficient method with a maximum number of arithmetic operations is proposed in [144] for VSI applications, like IPMSM drives, with hexagonal voltage constraints.…”
Section: Voltage Source Invertermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation