2001
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.65.015204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding quantum chaos in quantum computation

Abstract: We study a one-dimensional chain of nuclear 1/2−spins in an external time-dependent magnetic field. This model is considered as a possible candidate for experimental realization of quantum computation. According to general theory of interacting particles, one of the most dangerous effects is quantum chaos which can destroy the stability of quantum operations. The standard viewpoint is that the threshold for the onset of quantum chaos due to an interaction between spins (qubits) strongly decreases with an incre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
53
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their study usually proceeds by the splitting of the Hamiltonian as H = H d + λV , where H d is diagonal in some "natural" (e.g., mean field) basis and V induces mixing, and then the evolution of the system is followed as a function of λ. Some authors do it through quantities that depend on the wave functions-such as information entropy or number of principal components-and offer good physical insight but are basis and Hamiltonian dependent [4][5][6]. The widely followed alternative relies on the fluctuation properties of the spectrum, in particular the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution P (s, β), where s is the difference in energy of two consecutive levels in units of the local average spacing and β is a repulsion parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study usually proceeds by the splitting of the Hamiltonian as H = H d + λV , where H d is diagonal in some "natural" (e.g., mean field) basis and V induces mixing, and then the evolution of the system is followed as a function of λ. Some authors do it through quantities that depend on the wave functions-such as information entropy or number of principal components-and offer good physical insight but are basis and Hamiltonian dependent [4][5][6]. The widely followed alternative relies on the fluctuation properties of the spectrum, in particular the nearest-neighbor spacing distribution P (s, β), where s is the difference in energy of two consecutive levels in units of the local average spacing and β is a repulsion parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to chaos for Ω = 100 in dependence on J can be analytically understood with the use of the transformation to the "mean field basis" in which the Hamiltonian is diagonal in the absence of the inter-qubit interaction, J = 0. In this basis the term with J = 0 plays the role of the interaction between L blocks that correspond to quantum numbers, and the structure of the Hamiltonian matrix is similar to that of the TBRI model, see details in Ref [34].…”
Section: A Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inequality provides the simplest way to prepare a homogeneous superposition of 2 L states needed for the implementation of both Shor and Grover algorithms. The analytical and numerical treatment of the model (32) in this regime has shown [34] that constant gradient magnetic field (with the non-zero value of a) strongly reduces the effects of quantum chaos. Namely, the chaos border turns out to be independent of the number L of qubits, in contrast to the models thoroughly studied in Ref.…”
Section: A Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum theory of OSCAR MRFM has been developed in [4] with the same limitations as the quasiclassical theory. It was found, as may be expected, that the frequency shift δω c in quantum theory may assume only two values ±|δω c | corresponding to the two directions of the spin relative to the effective magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%