2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3300-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding neural network fine tuning by using ensemble learning: application to ball-end milling operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These cutting conditions were selected following the cutting tool provider specifications and the machine-tool capabilities. Although cutting conditions are regularly changed in experiments that focus on roughness quality prediction, in order to generate extensive datasets (Bustillo et al 2011a), the number of different cutting conditions is strongly reduced (Prasad et al 2011) or just limited to one cutting condition, as in this research (Rivero et al 2008), in the case of including tool wear. The main drive power was established in accordance with the online readings made using a Mori Seiki NMV 5000 during machining.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cutting conditions were selected following the cutting tool provider specifications and the machine-tool capabilities. Although cutting conditions are regularly changed in experiments that focus on roughness quality prediction, in order to generate extensive datasets (Bustillo et al 2011a), the number of different cutting conditions is strongly reduced (Prasad et al 2011) or just limited to one cutting condition, as in this research (Rivero et al 2008), in the case of including tool wear. The main drive power was established in accordance with the online readings made using a Mori Seiki NMV 5000 during machining.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high accuracy of ensemble predictions has been demonstrated in many milling processes: Bustillo et al (2011a) proposed the use of ensembles to predict surface roughness in ball-end milling operations. Maudes et al (2017) used random forest (RF) ensembles for the prediction of dimensional parameters in laser micromanufacturing of stents, and Ferreiro and Sierra (2012) used different kinds of ensembles for burr detection in a drydrilling process on aluminum Al 7075-T6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are the most widely used AI technique Grzenda et al 2012;Díez-Pastor et al 2012;Benardos and Vosniakos 2002;Samanta et al 2008;Correa et al 2008), although other techniques like neuro-fuzzy inference systems (Samanta et al 2008), Bayesian networks (Correa et al 2008), genetic algorithms (Brezocnik et al 2004), swarm optimization techniques (Zainal et al 2016), and support vector machines (Prakasvudhisarn et al 2008) have also been tested for the same industrial task. Unfortunately, ANN models are highly dependent on the parameters of the neural networks (Bustillo et al 2011) and the process of fine-tuning these parameters is a highly time-consuming task that frequently requires expertise for good results. Moreover, studies on surface-roughness prediction in face milling are scarce, compared with the large amount of studies focused on this prediction task for other milling operations, as emphasized in reviews of this domain (Chandrasekaran et al 2010;Abellan-Nebot 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four broad lines of research into surface roughness prediction (Benardos and Vosniakos 2003) based on: (1) machining theory (Montgomery and Altintas 1991;Ismail et al 1993;Quintana et al 2010;Arizmendi et al 2009); (2) experimental investigations (Beggan et al 1999;Vivancos et al 2005); (3) designed experiments (Choudhury and Bartarya 2003) and (4) artificial intelligence (Correa et al 2008;Benardos and Vosniakos 2002;Brezocnik and Kovacic 2003;Dhokia et al 2008;Quintana et al 2009;Lo 2003;Ho et al 2009;Iqbal et al 2007;Samanta et al 2008;Correa et al 2009;Brezocnik et al 2004;Prakasvudhisarn et al 2009;Bustillo et al 2011b). Nevertheless, the classifications in much of the literature, where no one single methodology is followed, are not always straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different alternative approaches to the industrial task of roughness prediction in milling operations have been tested with good results: neuro-fuzzy inference system (Lo 2003;Ho et al 2009;Iqbal et al 2007;Samanta et al 2008), Bayesian networks (Correa et al 2008(Correa et al , 2009, genetic algorithms (Brezocnik et al 2004;Brezocnik and Kovacic 2003) and support vector machines (Prakasvudhisarn et al 2009). However, the neural networks approach (Quintana et al 2009;Choudhury and Bartarya 2003;Benardos and Vosniakos 2002;Correa et al 2009;Bustillo et al 2011b) is the most widely used solution; Its most common configuration is a multilayer perceptron (MLP) with a single hidden layer (Groove 2006). Unfortunately, the results obtained are highly dependent on the parameters of the neural networks (Bustillo et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%