2013
DOI: 10.2175/106143012x13415215907176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoiding Digester Upset

Abstract: The acetate uptake bioassay (AUB) is a predictive measure for determining the stability of anaerobic digesters, but its use is rare due to the limited availability of gas chromatography equipment at wastewater treatment facilities. A water displacement system was compared and evaluated as an alternative to gas chromatography analysis for conducting the AUB. Results indicated that methane generation rates measured by the two methods were statistically the same. Precision of the method varied by less than 5%. Ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They determined that an MBR with a 300 kDa MWCO would be effective for the treatment of the recycle stream as it could remove up to 80 % of the organic matter, 60% of the UV254 quenching substances and 65% of the organic nitrogen. Thompson et al (2013) proposed a water displacement system as a low-cost alternative to gas chromatography for measuring methane generation rates from laboratory digesters with the method's precision being and reported the precision of the method varied from 9.2% for the lowest volumes of gas measured (1 mL) and 0.2% for the highest (21 mL).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They determined that an MBR with a 300 kDa MWCO would be effective for the treatment of the recycle stream as it could remove up to 80 % of the organic matter, 60% of the UV254 quenching substances and 65% of the organic nitrogen. Thompson et al (2013) proposed a water displacement system as a low-cost alternative to gas chromatography for measuring methane generation rates from laboratory digesters with the method's precision being and reported the precision of the method varied from 9.2% for the lowest volumes of gas measured (1 mL) and 0.2% for the highest (21 mL).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%