2019
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2018.2886614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoidance of Time-Varying Radio Frequency Interference With Software-Defined Cognitive Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [24], the authors developed a compressed sensing scheme to reduce the load of spectrum sensing on digital signal processors and used statistical techniques to estimate the behavior of a Primary User (PU) to guide radar transmissions. In contrast to scheduling user transmissions, SAA methods, which adapt the time and frequency locations of pulsed radar transmissions, have been utilized to reactively avoid interference [13]. However, SAA assumes that the interference behavior is stationary between time steps, and can be ineffective in scenarios when the channel's coherence time is very short.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [24], the authors developed a compressed sensing scheme to reduce the load of spectrum sensing on digital signal processors and used statistical techniques to estimate the behavior of a Primary User (PU) to guide radar transmissions. In contrast to scheduling user transmissions, SAA methods, which adapt the time and frequency locations of pulsed radar transmissions, have been utilized to reactively avoid interference [13]. However, SAA assumes that the interference behavior is stationary between time steps, and can be ineffective in scenarios when the channel's coherence time is very short.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former focuses on physical layer performance improvement and includes techniques such as transmit waveform optimization [8], cognitive beamforming [9], and resource management [10]. The latter focuses on spectrum sharing capabilities, and has employed game-theoretic approaches [11], spectrally contained waveform design [12], and rapid-reaction Sense-and-avoid (SAA) techniques [13] to avoid or mitigate interference. However, due to the massive amount of received data radars process as well as the ease of utilizing Channel State Information (CSI) due to co-location of the transmitter and receiver makes the radar control problem a natural candidate for decision-making machine learning algorithms [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bandwidth of high-resolution radar usually ranges from 100 MHz to several GHz, which is easily influenced by time-varying radio frequency interference (TRFI) [1], characterized by instantaneous frequency laws changing in time domain. These interferences can be either narrowband or wideband [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], and their center frequencies hardly follow a pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One proposed method for adaptive radar waveform selection is Sense-and-Avoid (SAA). SAA identifies occupied portions of the spectrum and directs radar transmissions to the largest contiguous open bandwidth [5]. However, SAA does not learn to recognize patterns, which can be used to avoid Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) in a strategic manner, where some RFI is avoided and interference with other signals may be allowed depending on application-specific preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%