2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-019-04452-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoidance of general anesthesia for circumcision in infants under 6 months of age using a modified Plastibell technique

Abstract: Purpose There is currently no gold standard for the type of analgesia or preferred circumcision technique in infants requiring circumcision after 1 month of age. Our study presents a modified Plastibell circumcision technique, which offers excellent surgical outcomes, and can be performed under local anesthesia until 6 months of age, thereby avoiding the risks of general anesthesia in delayed circumcision. Methods This is a retrospective case series of 508 consecutive m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success has been validated in numerous studies [2,4,6,8]. In most of the studies, the choice of anaesthetic/analgesic has been penile nerve block [9][10][11][12][13], although no gold standard procedure to address the pain in circumcision has been established [14]. In our study, the choice of anaesthetic was 2% Lignocaine with 1 ml solution infiltrated as a penile ring block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The success has been validated in numerous studies [2,4,6,8]. In most of the studies, the choice of anaesthetic/analgesic has been penile nerve block [9][10][11][12][13], although no gold standard procedure to address the pain in circumcision has been established [14]. In our study, the choice of anaesthetic was 2% Lignocaine with 1 ml solution infiltrated as a penile ring block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The value of combining non-pharmacological analgesic methods with DPNB has been demonstrated not only in newborns but also in older infants [12]. Similarly, by adding sucrose to other analgesic methods, either EMLA, DPRB, or RB, the result was a minimal pain level during MC [30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the risk of neurological damage secondary to the use of general anesthetics, general anesthesia for MC in newborns should be avoided [11]. The use of local anesthesia for MC has proven to be a safe and effective way to prevent procedural pain both in neonates and in older children [5,[12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in lower pain scores in the first postoperative hour and a longer interval should rescue analgesia be required. When the infant is younger than 6 months, general anaesthesia for MC should be avoided [ 238 ]. General anaesthesia has inherent risks, albiet low.…”
Section: Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%