2006
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arl061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
110
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
8
110
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our work also provides a new line of empirical evidence that these signals are highly reliable even under different light conditions. The latter finding may explain why these colors are better learnt by potential predators (Roper and Wistow, 1986;Roper, 1990;Exnerová et al, 2006a;Aronsson and Gamberalle-Stille, 2008) in comparison to other color combinations and achromatic signals (Osorio et al, 1999b). Here, we focus on the contrast of aposematic signals against an average green background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, our work also provides a new line of empirical evidence that these signals are highly reliable even under different light conditions. The latter finding may explain why these colors are better learnt by potential predators (Roper and Wistow, 1986;Roper, 1990;Exnerová et al, 2006a;Aronsson and Gamberalle-Stille, 2008) in comparison to other color combinations and achromatic signals (Osorio et al, 1999b). Here, we focus on the contrast of aposematic signals against an average green background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result can be explained in part by the higher frequency with which male great tits preyed on lasiocampids. The fact that females were more reluctant to exploit this prey type may be linked to personality traits (aggressive behaviour, risk-taking, explorative behaviour, and others), which often differ between sexes (males are more bold and aggressive than females) and may affect birds' reaction to aposematic prey such as Malacosoma neustria larvae (Exnerová et al, 2007). Regarding the effect of parental size on prey choice, we did not find any association between the body size of adults and their diet preferences ©Écoscience in either species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The birds' willingness to consume aposematic prey also strongly depends on their hunger level as the results of the current and some other studies show (Chai, 1986;Sandre & Mappes, in prep.). It can also depend on their ability to overcome prey defences, both within (Bowers & Farley, 1990) and between species (Exnerová et al, 2003), the presence of alternative prey (Hetz & Slobodchikoff, 1988;Lindström et al, 2001Lindström et al, , 2004, earlier experience (Endler, 1988;Lindström et al, 1999aLindström et al, , 2001Exnerová et al, 2007), within-species genetic biases (Marples & Brakefield, 1995), and more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%