1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01400867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avoidable factors that contribute to complications in the surgical treatment of chronic subdural haematoma

Abstract: The results of a personal series of 44 consecutive patients undergoing burrhole evacuation and closed system suction drainage for chronic subdural haematoma are presented. 43 patients made a complete recovery and one was left with moderate disability. Contralateral weakness in one patient, recurrence of haematoma in another, and a new contralateral haematoma in a third were the only complications. The operative procedures responsible for the rather low complication rate in this series are described. It is conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly relevant to the elderly patients who constitute the majority of patients treated for cSDH, as these patients are more susceptible to complications of immobility such as pneumonia and venous thrombosis. Despite the theoretical benefits of early mobilization, some investigators favor delayed mobilization following a period of recumbency with continuous closed system drainage, in the hopes of promoting brain expansion and thus prevent recurrence of cSDH [1,11]. Previous literature on this topic has reached mixed conclusions about the influence of patient mobilization on cSDH recurrence.…”
Section: Mobilization Of Patients Following Csdh Drainagementioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is particularly relevant to the elderly patients who constitute the majority of patients treated for cSDH, as these patients are more susceptible to complications of immobility such as pneumonia and venous thrombosis. Despite the theoretical benefits of early mobilization, some investigators favor delayed mobilization following a period of recumbency with continuous closed system drainage, in the hopes of promoting brain expansion and thus prevent recurrence of cSDH [1,11]. Previous literature on this topic has reached mixed conclusions about the influence of patient mobilization on cSDH recurrence.…”
Section: Mobilization Of Patients Following Csdh Drainagementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mobilization following surgical treatment of cSDH is an important aspect of postoperative care, especially since most patients are older and more susceptible to complications of immobility such as pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism [1]. On the other hand, delayed mobilization might promote brain expansion and thus prevent recurrence of cSDH [82,83]. Studies on this topic have reached mixed conclusions about the influence of patient mobilization on cSDH recurrence.…”
Section: Mobilization Of Patients Following Bhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent evaluation of the role of open craniotomy in the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) has indicated no disadvantages in carrying out this procedure [6], nowadays the vast majority of neurosurgeons prefer to use a variety of less invasive surgical methods offering burr-hole craniotomy (BHC) or twist-drill trephination (TDT) regimen with single evacuation or continuous closedsystem drainage of CSDH [3,4,7,9,12,13,16]. Other surgeons propose additional peri-operative lumbar intrathecal injection of Ringer's lactate solution after CSDH evacuation [5] or replacement of haematoma with oxygen after subdural tapping [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%