London 2013, 75th Eage Conference en Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec 2013
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AVO QC During Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Global QC via statistical parameters, calculated at the survey scale, to capture the global behavior of the signal: signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), quality and anomaly attributes for AVO QC (Coleou et al, 2013), and enhanced bandwidth at every preconditioning step. These QCs can be viewed globally or on selected horizons.…”
Section: Seismic Preconditioning and Inversion Workflow Seismic Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…• Global QC via statistical parameters, calculated at the survey scale, to capture the global behavior of the signal: signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), quality and anomaly attributes for AVO QC (Coleou et al, 2013), and enhanced bandwidth at every preconditioning step. These QCs can be viewed globally or on selected horizons.…”
Section: Seismic Preconditioning and Inversion Workflow Seismic Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows how the AVO response at the well A location was improved at each step in the preconditioning sequence (including spectral shaping) as shown by the decreasing dispersion of the points around the regression (which is preserved). Coleou et al (2013) introduce an efficient statistical tool that helps to quantify and monitor the AVO compliance of large amounts of prestack data, as well as identifying areas where further improvement in the data quality are required. Repeatability attributes called anomaly and quality, an orthogonalization of crosscorrelation and normalized rms amplitude (Nrms), are calculated between real traces and AVO model traces.…”
Section: Seismic Preconditioning and Inversion Workflow Seismic Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 2, the same velocity sections after constrained seismic inversion are shown. The Quality Indicator (QI) (Coléou al., 2013) is a repeatability attribute derived from Correlation and NRMS. It is used to quantify the match between seismic and synthetic traces after seismic inversion.…”
Section: Figure 1: Velocity Models With Sharp Contrasts Obtained By Mmentioning
confidence: 99%