1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avian Open-Field Research and Related Effects of Environmental Novelty: An Annotated Bibliography, 1960–1988

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OF or novel environment is a commonly used, though controversial, method of estimating fear. It involves transient isolation and exposure to an unfamiliar and normally barren environment under the assumption that more fearful birds will show greater inhibition of behavior (Faure et al, 1983;Jones, 1989b). Tonic immobility is a temporary state of motor inhibition and reduced responsiveness induced by brief physical restraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OF or novel environment is a commonly used, though controversial, method of estimating fear. It involves transient isolation and exposure to an unfamiliar and normally barren environment under the assumption that more fearful birds will show greater inhibition of behavior (Faure et al, 1983;Jones, 1989b). Tonic immobility is a temporary state of motor inhibition and reduced responsiveness induced by brief physical restraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behaviour in an open field, used to assess fearfulness in domestic fowl ( Jones, 1989), may provide a clue to the behavioural difference between the treated and control chicks. The treated chicks exhibited less latency to ambulate and to defecate in the open-field test, together with more vocalisation, suggesting that they were more anxious than control chicks (Zhang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test has been traditionally used to estimate fear (emotionality), although the interpretation ofopen-field behavior is a controversial issue. Indeed, researchers have evoked several behavioral constructs to explain their data; these have included fear, arousal, social motivation, predator evasion, exploration, and territorial marking (Archer, 1973;Gallup & Suarez, 1980;Gray, 1979;Jones, 1987aJones, , 1989Walsh & Cummins, 1976). However, these interpretations are not mutually incompatible, and it has been argued that fear may represent a common motivational state (Jones, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been suggested that the open-field responses ofyoung chicks may represent potential selection criteria for future commercial breeding programs (Faure, 1980). Here, however, there has also been considerable diversity in the types of open field used in different laboratories (Jones, 1989), and the floors either have remained unmarked or have been subdivided by white or black lines into squares, rectangles, circles, or various other shapes (Archer, 1976;Faure, 1981;Gallup, Ledbetter, & Maser, 1976;Jones & Waddington, 1992;Sanberg, Faulks, Anson, & Mark, 1982). The nature of the substrate used in the open field is already known to be influential, with chicks showing greater ambulation when it consisted of wood shavings or wire mesh rather than paper (Jones & Black, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation