Avian influenza virus monitoring in wintering waterbirds in Iran, 2003-2007

Abstract

BackgroundVirological, molecular and serological studies were carried out to determine the status of infections with avian influenza viruses (AIV) in different species of wild waterbirds in Iran during 2003-2007. Samples were collected from 1146 birds representing 45 different species with the majority of samples originating from ducks, coots and shorebirds. Samples originated from 6 different provinces representative for the 15 most important wintering sites of migratory waterbirds in Iran.ResultsOverall, AIV were detected in approximately 3.4% of the samples. However, prevalence was higher (up to 8.3%) at selected locations and for certain species. No highly pathogenic avian influenza, including H5N1 was detected. A total of 35 AIVs were detected from cloacal or oropharyngeal swab samples. These positive samples originated mainly from Mallards and Common Teals.Of 711 serum samples tested for AIV antibodies, 345 (48.5%) were positive by using a nucleoprotein-specific competitive ELISA (NP-C-ELISA). Ducks including Mallard, Common Teal, Common Pochard, Northern Shoveler and Eurasian Wigeon revealed the highest antibody prevalence ranging from 44 to 75%.ConclusionResults of these investigations provide important information about the prevalence of LPAIV in wild birds in Iran, especially wetlands around the Caspian Sea which represent an important wintering site for migratory water birds. Mallard and Common Teal exhibited the highest number of positives in virological and serological investigations: 43% and 26% virological positive cases and 24% and 46% serological positive reactions, respectively. These two species may play an important role in the ecology and perpetuation of influenza viruses in this region. In addition, it could be shown that both oropharyngeal and cloacal swab samples contribute to the detection of positive birds, and neither should be neglected.

Serological Surveillance of Wild Waterfowl in Northern Australia for Avian Influenza Virus Shows Variations in Prevalence and a Cyclical Periodicity of Infection

“…These findings suggest that virological testing alone does not always reflect the dynamics of AIV infection, a finding consistent with other wild bird studies that have included serological testing (4,5,23). Moreover, low rates of viral detection are likely related to the timing of sampling and the narrow window of opportunity to detect virus that is normally excreted for a short duration, or possibly other factors such as preexisting immunity in the flock.…”

Antibodies to Influenza A Virus in Wild Birds across Mongolia, 2006–2009

“…Antibody prevalence estimates and speciesspecific prevalence reported herein are consistent with trends from West and Central Asia and the Middle East (Fereidouni et al, 2010), with no detectable antibodies in Grey Herons (Ardea cinerea) or Great Cormorants and high prevalence in Anseriformes. The latter is consistent with patterns observed in Europe (Arenas et al, 1990;Astroga et al, 1994;De Marco et al, 2003), and North America (Brown et al, 2010) among wintering waterbirds.…”

Isolation of H9N2 avian influenza virus from bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) in Egypt

“…Migratory birds as a source of incursion cannot be ruled out presently, but it seems unlikely. Fereidouni et al [15] have shown that the H9 lineages circulating in wild birds in Iran are distinguishable from those in poultry.…”