Avian influenza, ‘viral sovereignty’, and the politics of health security in Indonesia

Abstract

In December 2006, Indonesian Health Minister, Siti Fadilah Supari, shocked the world when announcing her government would no longer be sharing samples of the H5N1 avian flu virus, collected from Indonesian patients, with the World Health Organization, at a time when global fears of a deadly influenza pandemic were running high. For observers of Southeast Asian politics, the decision reinforced the view of the region as made up of states determined to protect their national sovereignty, at almost all costs. This established view of the region, however, generally neglects the variable and selective manner in which sovereignty has been invoked by Southeast Asian governments, or parts thereof, and fails to identify the conditions shaping the deployment of sovereignty. In this article, it is argued that Siti's action was designed to harness claims of sovereignty to a domestic political struggle. It was a response to the growing fragmentation and, in some cases, denationalisation of the governance apparatus dealing with public health in Indonesia, along with the 'securitisation' of H5N1 internationally. The examination of the virus-sharing dispute demonstrates that in Southeast Asia sovereignty is not so much the ends of government action, but the means utilised by government actors for advancing particular political goals.

Critical security in the Asia-Pacific: an introduction

“…Of course Amitav Acharya's (2014) work has been central to examining the evolution of ASEAN as a security community in the constructivist tradition, while Evelyn Goh's (2013) analysis of regional order building in the region also draws on constructivist thought. On securitisation too, a range of analysts have identified the ways in which 'new' security issues such as disease, migration, environmental change, and energy access have been constructed as security threats (see Curley and Wong 2008;Hameiri 2014;Phillips 2013b). But we also see attempts to examine and account for traditional security dynamics through such analyses, with analysts exploring the securitisation of issues such as the South China Sea dispute (e.g.…”

From SARS to Avian Influenza: The Role of International Factors in China's Approach to Infectious Disease Control

“…In the diverse region of East Asia, traditional security issues like territorial integrity and protecting state sovereignty are still acknowledged as core to state decision making, but the threat of nontraditional security concerns like infectious disease, environmental pollution, organized crime, and terrorism have become a priority. 1,17 After Hu Jintao's appointment as President of China, there appeared to be a shift in Chinese diplomacy and rhetoric, emphasizing China's role as a responsible international state. In April 2003, Premier Wen Jiabao explicitly linked China's newly aggressive response to SARS to China's reputation as a responsible state.…”

“…[6][7][8][9]16 Other authors have done similar analyses for other East and Southeast Asian states. 1,17…”

The political economy of non-traditional security: Explaining the governance of Avian Influenza in Indonesia

“…The authors are grateful for the feedback received on this article from two reviewers, and from participants in the panel on (Hameiri, 2014).…”