2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2016.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida): A comparative analysis of different polymerase chain reaction assays in detection of mixed infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, results from these studies should be interpreted with caution when attempting to identify the true vectors of avian pathogens, this is especially true when pathogen DNA is isolated from an unexpected vector, and highlights the necessity to conduct further experimental studies of vectorial competence [10]. Although different approaches including cloning and the development of specific primers have been employed to identify parasite lineages in co-infected birds [7, 56, 57], our results show the importance of combining the molecular detection of blood parasites with the analysis of blood smears when aimed at identifying potential co-infections in birds [58]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, results from these studies should be interpreted with caution when attempting to identify the true vectors of avian pathogens, this is especially true when pathogen DNA is isolated from an unexpected vector, and highlights the necessity to conduct further experimental studies of vectorial competence [10]. Although different approaches including cloning and the development of specific primers have been employed to identify parasite lineages in co-infected birds [7, 56, 57], our results show the importance of combining the molecular detection of blood parasites with the analysis of blood smears when aimed at identifying potential co-infections in birds [58]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coinfections are often undetectable using standard PCR protocols, resulting frequently in the amplification of a single cytb sequence and thus to underestimation of Haemosporidian diversity (15). The PCR underestimation in mixed infection cases could, in turn, lead to unreliable morphomolecular parasite identifications and phylogenetic analyses, resulting in erroneous interpretations and conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using classical PCR and Sanger sequencing. This classical method favored the amplification and/or sequencing of only the N. medusiformis parasite in the case of the N. grandis mixed infection (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A problem is that the great majority of current avian malaria studies are based solely on PCR-based detection using general primers. This method does not provide information regarding from which parasite stage (infective or not) the PCR signal came and it markedly underestimates haemosporidian co-infections (Bernotienė et al, 2016). Consequently, the available information about genetic heterogeneity in bird-malaria interactions, if solely PCR was used in research, may not be complete even after accounting for putative vector feeding patterns, which were determined using the same methodology (Medeiros et al, 2013).…”
Section: Active Transmission Of Differentmentioning
confidence: 99%