2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00517.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avian flu: the creation of expectations in the interplay between science and the media

Abstract: This paper examines the emerging cultural patterns and interpretative repertoires in reports of an impending pandemic of avian flu in the UK mass media and scientific journals at the beginning of 2005, paying particular attention to metaphors, pragmatic markers ('risk signals'), symbolic dates and scare statistics used by scientists and the media to create expectations and elicit actions. This study complements other work on the metaphorical framing of infectious disease, such as foot and mouth disease and SAR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
127
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
127
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, an imaginary of the future is mobilized to change the present (Brown 2003). However, such expectations are perhaps somewhat low (though not negative; see Nerlich and Halliday 2007): our interviewees did not appear to consider that neuroscience would help to produce radical improvement in the world, but rather that it would help in small ways to improve particular aspects of the lives of some citizens. This may reflect the same ethic of pragmatism that underpinned the will to reduce the complexity of neuroscience that was evident in some of the interviews (see also Fitzgerald 2014;Gardner, Samuel, and Williams 2015;Pickersgill 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, an imaginary of the future is mobilized to change the present (Brown 2003). However, such expectations are perhaps somewhat low (though not negative; see Nerlich and Halliday 2007): our interviewees did not appear to consider that neuroscience would help to produce radical improvement in the world, but rather that it would help in small ways to improve particular aspects of the lives of some citizens. This may reflect the same ethic of pragmatism that underpinned the will to reduce the complexity of neuroscience that was evident in some of the interviews (see also Fitzgerald 2014;Gardner, Samuel, and Williams 2015;Pickersgill 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have revealed in earlier work into the WHO global strategy (Brown and Bell, 2007), this is certainly a theoretical frame that is worth pursuing further. Moreover, it is one that allows us to consider critically the "hype and hope" that is embedded within the discourse of international organisations like WHO, concerned as they are with managing individual conduct in ways that replicate the desires of the national bio-political state (Nerlich and Halliday, 2007). Yet, we need to take care when extending this form of analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaphors have been shown to be borrowed from academic publications and be reused and adapted to a variety of audiences and communicative purposes, both by popular authors and journalists (Nerlich & Halliday, 2007, Stelmach & Nerlich, 2015. The examples below show how the scientists adopted the metaphors that the journalists produced to complete their explanatory or framing tasks.…”
Section: Adaptable Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metaphors that scientists use are often picked-up by journalists from academic papers, commentaries or press releases (Nerlich & Halliday, 2007, Nerlich & Koteyko, 2009, Stelmach & Nerlich, 2015. However, while popular science studies have examined the metaphors that authors use (Semino, 2008, Kapon et al, 2009 analyses of news reports have focused primarily on how journalists, rather than experts, use these metaphors when presenting research or expert advice (Woods et al, 2012, Atanasova & Koteyko, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation