Aversive Imagery in Panic Disorder: Agoraphobia Severity, Comorbidity, and Defensive Physiology

Abstract

Background Panic is characterized as a disorder of interoceptive physiological hyperarousal, secondary to persistent anticipation of panic attacks. The novel aim of the present research was to investigate whether severity of agoraphobia within panic disorder covaries with the intensity of physiological reactions to imagery of panic attacks and other aversive scenarios. Methods A community sample of principal panic disorder (n=112; 41 without agoraphobia, 71 with agoraphobia) and control (n=76) participants imagined threatening and neutral events while acoustic startle probes were presented and the eye-blink response (orbicularis oculi) recorded. Changes in heart rate, skin conductance level, and facial expressivity were also measured. Results Overall panic disorder patients exceeded controls in startle reflex and heart rate during imagery of standard panic attack scenarios, concordant with more extreme ratings of aversion and emotional arousal. Accounting for the presence of agoraphobia revealed that both panic disorder with and without situational apprehension showed the pronounced heart rate increases during standard panic attack imagery observed for the sample as a whole. In contrast, startle potentiation to aversive imagery was more robust in those without versus with agoraphobia. Reflex diminution was most dramatic in those with the most pervasive agoraphobia, coincident with the most extreme levels of comorbid broad negative affectivity, disorder chronicity, and functional impairment. Conclusions Principal panic disorder may represent initial, heightened interoceptive fearfulness and concomitant defensive hyperactivity, which through progressive generalization of anticipatory anxiety, ultimately transitions to a disorder of pervasive agoraphobic apprehension and avoidance, broad dysphoria and compromised mobilization for defensive action.

Allelic variation in CRHR1 predisposes to panic disorder: evidence for biased fear processing

“…Importantly, risk allele carriers reported comparable high subjective distress during the test, which, interestingly, was not linked to autonomic mobilization demonstrating the physiological preparation for behavioral responses during acute threat: While patients carrying the non-risk allele variant showed large correlations between reported anxiety and heart rate response during BAT exposure, risk-allele carriers did not. In line with previous results that demonstrated reduced threat related defensive reactivity in those PD/AG patients reporting pervasive agoraphobic apprehension and avoidance, but also broad dysphoria and general distress 67 , the rs16689918 risk allele was associated with pronounced depressive symptoms (BDI-II), general distress (BSI) and agoraphobic avoidance (MI) in the BAT sample (see supplemental table 3). Therefore rs16689918 might increase the risk for PD by facilitating the development of anxious apprehension.…”

Listening to the heart: A meta-analysis of cognitive behavior therapy impact on the heart rate of patients with anxiety disorders

“…The controversial results could also be connected to differential physiological reactivity among panic patients even before the therapeutic intervention. McTeague et al (2011) showed increased reactivity in panic patients without, or with moderate, agoraphobia; but observed reduced reactivity to startle probe in panic patients with severe agoraphobia.…”

Considering ERP difference scores as individual difference measures: Issues with subtraction and alternative approaches

“…We emphasize, however, that the conceptual issues apply to all psychophysiological studies that correlate individual difference measures with subtraction-based difference scores-a practice that is actually quite common. For instance, recent studies in emotion often subtract neutral from emotional condition averages to quantify individual differences in emotional reactivity (Angus, Kemkes, Schutter, & Harmon-Jones, 2015;Bress, Meyer, & Hajcak, 2015;Burkhouse, Siegle, Woody, Kudinova, & Gibb, 2015;Hoenen, L€ ubke, & Pause, 2015;Kornilov, Magnuson, Rakhlin, Landi, & Grigorenko, 2015;McTeague, Lang, Laplante, & Bradley, 2011;Meyer, Hajcak, Torpey-Newman, Kujawa, & Klein, 2015;Sylvester, Hudziak, Gaffrey, Barch, & Luby, 2015). Indeed, current recommendations from experts in the field involve "isolating components of interest by creating [subtraction-based] difference waves" (Luck, 2014).…”