2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00248-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Averaging technique for FE – a posteriori error control in elasticity. Part I: Conforming FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…but are independent of u, f or any mesh-size in T. The reliability proof goes back essentially to the dominance of the edge contributions in standard residual-based error control by [27] and can be found in [13,23] for the Poisson problem at hand and in [15,[17][18][19] for related problems.…”
Section: Q(t) ⊆ P K (T) ∩ H(div ω)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…but are independent of u, f or any mesh-size in T. The reliability proof goes back essentially to the dominance of the edge contributions in standard residual-based error control by [27] and can be found in [13,23] for the Poisson problem at hand and in [15,[17][18][19] for related problems.…”
Section: Q(t) ⊆ P K (T) ∩ H(div ω)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their theoretical foundation is less obvious and, in many applications, the use of averaging schemes remains indeed doubtful; see [7,[14][15][16][17][18][19] for positive results. The simplest setting for an explanation of dual and primal variables and their averaging is the 2D Poisson problem with given right-hand side f ∈ L (Ω) in a polygonal Lipschitz domain Ω and a unique weak solution u ∈ H (Ω) to…”
Section: Averaging Of the Dual Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carstensen and Funken [31,32] presented an error estimator, based on recoverytype error estimators, providing upper bounds of the error in energy norm, under certain assumptions of smoothness of the solution which permit to neglect the lack of internal equilibrium of the recovered solution. Díez et al [33] presented a methodology to obtain computable upper bounds of the error in the energy norm considering the stress recovered field provided by the SPR-C technique and taking into account the lack of internal equilibrium of the recovered stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is well known that averaging or gradient recovery techniques are a popular tool for improved convergence or superconvergence of finite element methods in elliptic partial differential equations with applications to a posteriori error control (see for example [21,22,23,24]). For nonconvex minimization problems such techniques have not been recommended as the energy minimization process enforces finer and finer oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%