The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2010-05232-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Averages over hyperplanes, sum-product theory in vector spaces over finite fields and the Erdős-Falconer distance conjecture

Abstract: Abstract. We prove a pointwise and average bound for the number of incidences between points and hyperplanes in vector spaces over finite fields. While our estimates are, in general, sharp, we observe an improvement for product sets and sets contained in a sphere. We use these incidence bounds to obtain significant improvements on the arithmetic problem of covering F q , the finite field with q elements, by A · A + · · · + A · A, where A is a subset F q of sufficiently large size. We also use the incidence mac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
146
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For finite field versions of these problems see, for example, [12] and [2]. In all of these instances, the exponents are not optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For finite field versions of these problems see, for example, [12] and [2]. In all of these instances, the exponents are not optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of comparable sum-product results for large subsets of finite fields; we refer particularly to [11] and to [14,15]. (M. Rudnev has pointed out to me that Proposition 1.7 can be proved in an alternative way, as a consequence of a Szemerédi-Trotter type theorem (for instance [30,Theorem 3]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Schoen & Shkredov [167] have successfully used a "cubic" generalization of the energy. We also have had to leave out such exciting areas of additive combinatorics in finite fields as • the Erdős distance problem [83,94,117,130,132,144,145] as well as its modification in some other settings (distinct volumes, configurations, and so on defined by arbitrary sets in F n q ) and metrics [14,64,142,195,200,202,203,205]; • the Kakeya problem and other related problems about the directions defined by arbitrary sets in vector spaces over a finite field, see [84-86, 88, 128, 131, 151]; • estimating the size of the sets in a finite field that avoid arithmetic or geometric progressions, sum sets and similar linear and non-linear relations; in particular these results include finite field analogues of the Roth and Szemerédi theorems, see [1,6,8,12,77,81,112,113,153,154,158,181]; • estimating the size of the sets in vector spaces over a finite field that define only some restrictive geometric configurations such as integral distances, acute angles, and pairwise orthogonal systems, see [75,133,134,183,194,204]; • distribution of the values of determinants and permanents of matrices with entries from general sets, see [74,196,197]; and several others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%