1961
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.122.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average Radiative Capture Cross Sections for 7- to 170-kev Neutrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Capture cross sections for 141 Pr are compared to recent libraries and measurements as shown in fall 4. Our results reproduce the experimental data [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] below and above the URR. Sm-isotopes (n,2n) Sm-isotopes (n,2n) Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Capture cross sections for 141 Pr are compared to recent libraries and measurements as shown in fall 4. Our results reproduce the experimental data [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] below and above the URR. Sm-isotopes (n,2n) Sm-isotopes (n,2n) Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…5, the agreement between Popov's 06 l, Weston's< 17 J and the present data are fairly good within the experimental error. Gibbons' data< 14 J have slightly steep gradient in the energy dependence in the same way as their 93 Nb(n, 7) data, which may be the effect of using In shows about a 10% higher value than the present result.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…For some data, special corrections were introduced. In particular, Gibbons et al [17] have used the nat In(n, ) reaction as a monitor in relative measurements. The new recommended monitor cross sections for this experiment was calculated as a sum of the ENDF/B-VII.1 evaluations for the 113 In(n, ) and 115 In(n, ) reaction cross-sections.…”
Section: The Experimental Data Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of 33 experiments have been analysed. A part of the experimental data ( [13][14][15], [17,18], [21], [23], [26], [28][29][30], [35][36][37][38]) was corrected to new recommended monitor reaction cross-sections and decay data. For some data, special corrections were introduced.…”
Section: The Experimental Data Basementioning
confidence: 99%