Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Neutrinos — PoS(NuFACT2018) 2019
DOI: 10.22323/1.341.0144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Average CsI neutron density distribution from COHERENT data

Abstract: Using the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering data of the COHERENT experiment, we determine for the first time the average neutron rms radius of 133 Cs and 127 I. We obtain the practically model-independent value Rn = 5.5 +0.9 −1.1 fm using the symmetrized Fermi and Helm form factors. We also point out that the COHERENT data show a 2.3σ evidence of the nuclear structure suppression of the full coherence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I, a precision measurement of CEνNS provides a direct probe to both SM and beyond the standard model (BSM) physics. Paradigmatic examples of the former are the determination of the weak mixing angle at very low momentum transfer [27][28][29], and the study of nuclear structure [17][18][19][20]. The program of BSM exploration with CEνNS is broad (see [6-15, 21-26, 30, 32-34, 126, 127] for an incomplete list) being most sensitive to a variety of scenarios leading to modified neutrino interactions with nuclei -in particular at low momentum transfer -but extending also to the production of new light neutral states, and sterile neutrino searches, among others.…”
Section: Physics Reachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I, a precision measurement of CEνNS provides a direct probe to both SM and beyond the standard model (BSM) physics. Paradigmatic examples of the former are the determination of the weak mixing angle at very low momentum transfer [27][28][29], and the study of nuclear structure [17][18][19][20]. The program of BSM exploration with CEνNS is broad (see [6-15, 21-26, 30, 32-34, 126, 127] for an incomplete list) being most sensitive to a variety of scenarios leading to modified neutrino interactions with nuclei -in particular at low momentum transfer -but extending also to the production of new light neutral states, and sterile neutrino searches, among others.…”
Section: Physics Reachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, then, according to (80) and normalization condition for spin wave functions (76), the amplitude . If this amplitude is defined for the case of as , at any it can be written as follows: (81) The common kinematic factor in ( 79) can be rearranged with separating out the leading factor , where and are the masses of the nucleon and the nucleus, and introducing the correction with the value of about unity (82) Substituting ( 78), (80), and ( 82) into (79), we obtain a "final" formula of this section for the amplitude of the process in the leading order in the Fermi constant (83) where (84) is the scalar product of the leptonic and th nucleon weak neutral currents. In particular, for the neutrino one obtains Matrix element ( 83) is a sum of lepton-nucleon amplitudes proportional to the scalar product of the currents weighted with two factors, each being not very different from unity.…”
Section: H P P P P Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( ) 1 3 Based on the universally accepted Fermi (or Woods-Saxon) charge density distribution, the symmetrized Fermi (SF) form factor, according to [82], has the form (141) where the parameters expressed in fm (142) have the meaning of the half-density radius and the diffuseness. The nuclear surface thickness is parametrized in the form of the relation [84]. For the SF form factor, the first three moments in expansion (137) are, according to [54], (143) There is also the Klein-Nystrand (KN) form factor, which formally follows from the convolution of the…”
Section: Ce Ns and The Nuclear Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, is the interaction rate and recoil distribution as predicted by the standard model? The answer will have large implications in understanding supernovae [4,5], non-standard interactions [6][7][8], and the nuclear physics of neutron distributions [9,10].…”
Section: Coherent Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%