2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03159-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avelumab in paediatric patients with refractory or relapsed solid tumours: dose-escalation results from an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial

Abstract: Background We report dose-escalation results from an open-label, phase 1/2 trial evaluating avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in paediatric patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumours. Methods In phase 1, patients aged < 18 years with solid (including central nervous system [CNS]) tumours for which standard therapy did not exist or had failed were enrolled in sequential cohorts of 3–6 patients. Patients received avelumab 10 or 20 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have investigated immunotherapy in pediatric patients with advanced tumors. To date, nivolumab (NCT0230445848 [ 12 ]), pembrolizumab (NCT0233266849 [ 4 ]), atezolizumab (NCT0254160450 [ 13 ]), and avelumab (NCT0345182551 [ 14 ]) have been investigated as monotherapies for recurrent and refractory pediatric tumors, but only 3% of patients with solid tumors experienced an objective response across all four trials. Compared with adult cancers, most pediatric cancers have lower mutational burdens and fewer infiltrating T cells, which may account for this lack of efficacy [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have investigated immunotherapy in pediatric patients with advanced tumors. To date, nivolumab (NCT0230445848 [ 12 ]), pembrolizumab (NCT0233266849 [ 4 ]), atezolizumab (NCT0254160450 [ 13 ]), and avelumab (NCT0345182551 [ 14 ]) have been investigated as monotherapies for recurrent and refractory pediatric tumors, but only 3% of patients with solid tumors experienced an objective response across all four trials. Compared with adult cancers, most pediatric cancers have lower mutational burdens and fewer infiltrating T cells, which may account for this lack of efficacy [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding anti-PD-L1 agents, a phase I/II study of atezolizumab in pediatric patients and young adults with refractory or relapsed solid tumors showed partial remission in 1/75 patients treated for ST, with a good toxicity profile [ 148 ]. Likewise, a phase I study of avelumab described four stabilizations of disease in 21 patients treated for R/R ST, without grade 4–5 adverse events [ 158 ].…”
Section: The Role Of Immunomodulating Agents On Tmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Avelumab produced no objective responses. 51 Outside of a single partial response using pembrolizumab against a high-grade glioma, no responses were seen in the most common pediatric solid tumors, including central nervous system tumors, neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. In total, across all four trials, only 3% of patients with solid tumors experienced an objective response.…”
Section: Ici Experience In Pediatric Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Similarly, in the trial evaluating avelumab, only one patient with an atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor was included; again, there was no response. 51 The responses that did occur were extremely limited and could correspond to atypical cases. However, three responses among 15 patients with a SMARCB1-deficient tumor type represents a preliminary signal of efficacy for a single agent, especially compared with the 3% efficacy rate observed in solid tumors overall.…”
Section: Immune Checkpoint Inhibition In Smarcb1-deficient Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%