Abstract:Dados referentes a 467 lactações e 5.604 controles de bovinos da raça Guzerá, controladas entre 1987 e 2004, foram utilizados com objetivos de se estimar os parâmetros genéticos e predizer os valores genéticos para a produção de leite (PLDC) e de gordura (PGDC) no dia do controle, e comparar a classificação dos animais por estimativas obtidas mediante análises unicaracterísticas. A PLDC e PGDC foram analisadas através de um modelo animal, em análises unicaracterísticas, considerando-se as quatro primeiras lact… Show more
“…The phenotypic LMY and DIM performances observed in this study were close to those observed in other studies with the Guzerat breed (Cobuci et al, 2000;Martinez et al, 2000;Cruz et al, 2006).…”
Section: Productive and Reproductive Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the analysis of milk yield, some authors have used comparable statistical models, but without considering the inbreeding coefficient as a covariate (Cobuci et al, 2000;Cruz et al, 2006;Peixoto et al, 2006). In the present study, since there were a great number of inbred animals in the herd, the inclusion of the inbreeding coefficient was necessary for the adjustment of the estimated breeding values of highly inbred cows or bulls with highly inbred daughters.…”
Section: Productive and Reproductive Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same paper, these authors presented results from other studies, with estimates varying from 0.25 to 0.38 in the Jersey breed. Cruz et al (2006) estimated the value 0.13 for the heritability coefficient for milk yield in the Guzerat breed, however, using a production file with a reduced number of records. Cobuci et al (2000) estimated values from 0.16 to 0.23 and Peixoto et al (2006) estimated the value of 0.23, both for the heritability coefficients of milk yield in the Guzerat breed.…”
Section: Productive and Reproductive Data Analysismentioning
ABSTRACT. The observation of bovine mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphisms allows the separation of American zebu cattle, according to its maternal lineage ancestry, into two groups: one with Bos indicus mtDNA and other with Bos taurus mtDNA. The aim of the present study was to determine the productive and reproductive differences between these two groups, in a Guzerat dairy herd. The genotyping of a sample of 56 animals allowed the categorization of most of the 3835 animals in the pedigree file. The production file included 3528 calving and 3198 lactation records from 729 cows, born during the years 1947 to 2007. The traits considered were: lactation milk yield (LMY); days in milk (DIM); age at first calving (AFC), and calving interval (CI). Heritabilities and breeding values were estimated using an animal model. The regression of the average breeding values per year of birth indicated the genetic trends of the herd. The heritability coefficients estimated for LMY, DIM, AFC, and CI were 0.42, 0.43, 0.20, and 0.10, Bos indicus or Bos taurus mitochondrial DNA -Guzerat respectively. The genetic trends were similar for both groups, pointing to an improvement in the productive and a worsening in the reproductive traits. The two groups differed significantly regarding the average estimated breeding values for LMY, DIM and AFC, in the starting period, until 1970, but no differences were observed in the more recent years, after 1970. The segregation between the groups existed in the starting period, probably because the Bos taurus contributions to the herd had occurred more recently at that moment. The conclusion is that mtDNA has no significant effect on these traits.
“…The phenotypic LMY and DIM performances observed in this study were close to those observed in other studies with the Guzerat breed (Cobuci et al, 2000;Martinez et al, 2000;Cruz et al, 2006).…”
Section: Productive and Reproductive Data Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the analysis of milk yield, some authors have used comparable statistical models, but without considering the inbreeding coefficient as a covariate (Cobuci et al, 2000;Cruz et al, 2006;Peixoto et al, 2006). In the present study, since there were a great number of inbred animals in the herd, the inclusion of the inbreeding coefficient was necessary for the adjustment of the estimated breeding values of highly inbred cows or bulls with highly inbred daughters.…”
Section: Productive and Reproductive Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same paper, these authors presented results from other studies, with estimates varying from 0.25 to 0.38 in the Jersey breed. Cruz et al (2006) estimated the value 0.13 for the heritability coefficient for milk yield in the Guzerat breed, however, using a production file with a reduced number of records. Cobuci et al (2000) estimated values from 0.16 to 0.23 and Peixoto et al (2006) estimated the value of 0.23, both for the heritability coefficients of milk yield in the Guzerat breed.…”
Section: Productive and Reproductive Data Analysismentioning
ABSTRACT. The observation of bovine mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphisms allows the separation of American zebu cattle, according to its maternal lineage ancestry, into two groups: one with Bos indicus mtDNA and other with Bos taurus mtDNA. The aim of the present study was to determine the productive and reproductive differences between these two groups, in a Guzerat dairy herd. The genotyping of a sample of 56 animals allowed the categorization of most of the 3835 animals in the pedigree file. The production file included 3528 calving and 3198 lactation records from 729 cows, born during the years 1947 to 2007. The traits considered were: lactation milk yield (LMY); days in milk (DIM); age at first calving (AFC), and calving interval (CI). Heritabilities and breeding values were estimated using an animal model. The regression of the average breeding values per year of birth indicated the genetic trends of the herd. The heritability coefficients estimated for LMY, DIM, AFC, and CI were 0.42, 0.43, 0.20, and 0.10, Bos indicus or Bos taurus mitochondrial DNA -Guzerat respectively. The genetic trends were similar for both groups, pointing to an improvement in the productive and a worsening in the reproductive traits. The two groups differed significantly regarding the average estimated breeding values for LMY, DIM and AFC, in the starting period, until 1970, but no differences were observed in the more recent years, after 1970. The segregation between the groups existed in the starting period, probably because the Bos taurus contributions to the herd had occurred more recently at that moment. The conclusion is that mtDNA has no significant effect on these traits.
“…In this respect, whereas some animals have good milk yield persistence, others reduce, or even cease, production early in lactation. Cruz et al (2006), who also studied TDMY in Guzerat cows, observed a similar trend of variance components during the early period of lactation, including the observation of higher heritabilities compared to midlactation. However, the range of heritability values was wider (from 0.03 in the fifth month to 0.29 in the eighth and tenth months).…”
a b s t r a c tMilk production in tropical environments requires the use of crossbreeding systems including breeds well adapted to harsh conditions, but with lower productivities when compared to specialized breeds. Besides the genetic improvement for milk production, lactation lengths also need to be studied for most of these breeds. Accordingly, genetic parameters were estimated for 305-day cumulative milk yield (MY305), test-day milk yield (TDMY), and lactation length (LL) using information from the first lactations of 2816 Guzerat cows selected for milk production in 28 herds in Brazil. Contemporary groups were defined as herd, year and season of the test for TDMY, and as herd, year and season of calving for MY305 and LL. Variance components were estimated with the restricted maximum likelihood method under a multi-trait animal model. Heritabilities estimated for TDMY ranged from 0.16 to 0.24, and were 0.24 and 0.12 for MY305 and LL, respectively. Genetic correlations were high and positive, ranging from 0.51 to 0.99 among TDMY records, from 0.81 to 0.98 between each TDMY and MY305, and from 0.71 to 0.94 between each TDMY and LL. Genetic parameters obtained in this study indicated the possibility of using test-day records for the prediction of breeding values for milk yield in this population of the Guzerat breed. The use of TDMY as selection criteria would result in indirect gains in MY305 and LL. However, the highest response to selection for MY305 would be obtained by direct selection for this trait.
The study was undertaken to estimate the genetic parameters, direct and correlated responses for the test day and lactation milk yield in Frieswal cattle. Data on 9,955 daily milk yield records of 973 Frieswal cows calved during 2005 to 2014 at Ambala and Meerut dairy farms were utilized. The variance components, heritability estimates, genetic and phenotypic correlations for all the 11 traits were estimated simultaneously by fitting multi-trait animal model using the Wombat program of Meyer (2006) with contemporary groups as fixed effect, the additive genetic random effects, linear and quadratic regressions of covariate age at first calving and linear regression of covariate first lactation length. The expected genetic gain (DG), correlated response (CR) in cumulative 305-day yield and vice versa and the relative efficiency (RE %) of selection based on different test day yields were estimated. The results revealed lower additive genetic variance and heritability estimates for different test days and cumulative 305-day yield. The genetic correlations between the test days up to 225 and cumulative 305-days were higher which indicated the positive relationship between these traits. The higher correlated responses in cumulative 305- day yield estimated through the selection for TD135, TD165 and TD45, in that order indicated that early selection of sires using test day records would be efficient in genetic improvement for lactational milk yield in Frieswal breed of cattle.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.