The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.21722/rbps.v18i1.15136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação de serviços de saúde no campo da Saúde Coletiva: uma sistematização em curso

Abstract: -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have highlighted knowledge gaps in the assessment of professional practices and the evaluation of health services 9,10 remains a challenge for the majority of health providers given the complexities involved 9 . In view of the above, the aim of this study was to assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care among doctors, nurses, and obstetrics residency program residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have highlighted knowledge gaps in the assessment of professional practices and the evaluation of health services 9,10 remains a challenge for the majority of health providers given the complexities involved 9 . In view of the above, the aim of this study was to assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care among doctors, nurses, and obstetrics residency program residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, very low values (α ≤ 0.30) were not obtained in any of the tests. The purification process was not enough to increase Alpha, demonstrating that the construct requires improvement in how to operate it in items 16 - 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to evaluate the internal consistency of the instrument. It is a coefficient that measures the correlation between the answers in a questionnaire through the analysis of the profile of the answers given by the respondents, whose values vary from 0 to 1 14 - 17 . The closer to 1, the greater the reliability of the indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations

Teamwork Scale for Youth

Priscila Pereira da Silva,
Morais Peixoto
2024
Psico