2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-84042005000200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação de métodos de preservação de amostras de plantas de savanas neotropicais para a obtenção de DNA de alta qualidade para estudos moleculares

Abstract: -(Evaluation of methods of neotropical savanna plant samples preservation for yielding high quality DNA for molecular studies). Methods for the preservation of leaf sample from plants occurring in neotropical savannas were compared, with the aim to get high quality DNA for molecular studies. Different methods for DNA isolation of the same samples were also compared. The DNA quality was evaluated by two empirical methods: digestion of the DNA with three restriction enzymes and by amplification of the mitochondr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for Neotropical savanna species, the use of silica gel was not recommended for preservation of leaves prior to DNA extraction (FERES et al, 2005). However, these authors report that environmental conditions could have activated dehydration mechanisms in these plants and suggest that the silica gel preservation method may still be effective for other species (FERES et al, 2005). E. precatoria occurs in a different environment with high humidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for Neotropical savanna species, the use of silica gel was not recommended for preservation of leaves prior to DNA extraction (FERES et al, 2005). However, these authors report that environmental conditions could have activated dehydration mechanisms in these plants and suggest that the silica gel preservation method may still be effective for other species (FERES et al, 2005). E. precatoria occurs in a different environment with high humidity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimates of DNA concentrations for the different treatments were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and, when significant differences were observed, the means were grouped by the Scott-Knott test at the 1% significance level. The analysis was performed using the statistical package SISVAR (FERREIRA, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results with silica gel are consistent with those presented by Cascales et al (2014) and Gottlieb and Poggio (2014), for storing young mate leaves. In contrast, dehydration of Kielmeyera lathrophyton samples with silica gel was not adequate (Feres et al, 2005). Silica gel is commonly used to preserve plant samples as it is simple and conserves DNA integrity, even though moisture levels must be maintained after an extended period of time (Gostel et al, 2016;Funk et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed in previous studies, the CTAB extraction method described by Doyle and Doyle (1987) have been adapted for a large number of plant species and forest species, such as Apuleia leiocarpa (Lencina et al, 2016) and Plinia cauliflora (Danner et al, 2011). However, the method does not allow for DNA extraction for Kielmeyera lathrophyton and K. petiolaris (Feres et al, 2005). This methodology is characterized by the use of the cationic detergent CTAB in the extraction buffer, which is necessary for separating nucleic acids from polysaccharides, since polysaccharides have different solubilities in the presence of this detergent (Romano and Brasileiro, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All molecular analyses, to be successful, depend on obtaining DNA samples of quality. Therefore, procedures are needed for efficient collection and storage of plant material, as well as isolation of the DNA molecule [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Experience shows that the use of fresh material is ideal for holding the DNA isolation [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%