AVALIAÇÃO DA RESTAURAÇÃO PASSIVA DE UMA ÁREA DE MATA ATLÂNTICA APÓS O CORTE RASO DE UMA PLANTAÇÃO DE &lt;i&gt;Cupressus lusitanica &lt;/i&gt;MILL

Cielo-Filho, Roque; Souza, Joice Aparecida Dias de

doi:10.5902/1980509822748

Cited by 32 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Forest recovery varies and depends on several local and regional environmental factors (Elias et al 2020) and some parameters may take centuries to recover, such as floristic composition (Chazdon 2014; Crouzeilles et al 2016; Rozendaal et al 2019). Aspects such as intensity and quality of seed rain, distinction in relation to landscape contexts, type and duration of agricultural activities, and soil properties influence the distribution of species and act directly on the floristic similarity between areas (Kunz et al 2009; Holl & Zahawi 2014; Jakovac et al 2015; Brancalion et al 2016; Cielo‐Filho & Souza 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forest recovery by direct seeding on the southern edge of the Brazilian Amazon

de Aragão,

Elias,

das Neves

et al. 2023

Restoration Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Broad‐scale parameters are crucial for the restoration of forest to align with the United Nations resolutions for the “Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.” Direct seeding is a moderately priced, active method with potential use in forest recovery. This study evaluated the recovery of woody vegetation from 23 restored forests (RF) located on the southern edge of the Brazilian Amazon, a region known as the “Arc of Deforestation”. We ask: (1) What are the differences in abundance, species richness, and alpha diversity between seeded and regenerated species in RF? (2) How does the structure, floristic composition, species richness, and alpha diversity of RF compare with adjacent primary forests (PF)? After 12 years of intervention, our results reveal that RFs exhibited lower species richness, alpha diversity, aboveground biomass (AGB), basal area, and dissimilar floristic composition when compared to PFs. Recovery in PFs reached 40% for AGB, 55% for basal area, 24% for alpha diversity, and 60% for species richness. These findings indicate ongoing recovery of evaluated parameters, highlighting the success of the seeding method in restoring degraded riparian forests. We also observed similar species richness between seeded and regenerated species in RFs, yet absolute density, AGB, and alpha diversity were higher in seeded species. The notable presence of non‐seeded species in our plots provides evidence that direct seeding fosters spontaneous regeneration from the regional species pool. Our findings suggest that direct seeding is a viable option for restoring forest structure and diversity in areas with limited or no potential for passive regeneration.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forest recovery by direct seeding on the southern edge of the Brazilian Amazon

de Aragão,

Elias,

das Neves

et al. 2023

Restoration Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ao longo do anos, experimentações de variações das estratégias de restauração foram realizadas (Klippel;Pezzopane;Silva;Caldeira;Pimenta;Toledo, 2015;Cielo-Filho;Souza, 2016;Oliveira;Barroso;Andrade;Freitas, 2016;Coutinho;Valcarel;Trentin;Estevan;Rossetto;Gorenstein;Brizola;Bechara, 2018;Schaffer;Mattar;Nakajima;Silva;Borges;Borges;Carpanezzi;Neves;Angelo;Britez, 2020). Portanto, quais as informações disponíveis sobre as estratégias de restauração ecológica de áreas protegidas do bioma Mata Atlântica?…”

Section: )unclassified

Espécies, práticas silviculturais e monitoramento: estratégias para restauração ecológica de áreas protegidas da Mata Atlântica

Schneider,

Angelo,

Angelo

et al. 2023

Ciênc. Florest.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Para entender a condução de novos paradigmas voltados à restauração ecológica, o objetivo deste trabalho foi revisar a literatura sobre a aplicação da restauração ecológica em áreas protegidas do bioma Mata Atlântica, a fim de contribuir ao cumprimento dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS). Com uso de indexadores, palavras-chave voltadas, e a critérios voltados ao tema, foram selecionados 58 artigos científicos analisados por meio de uma revisão sistemática e comparados entre si no uso de suas estratégias. Os resultados mostraram preferência pela restauração ativa com variações na diversidade de espécies, e a restauração passiva. Adubação, controle de plantas competidoras, combate a formigas e o preparo do solo são as práticas silviculturais mais mencionadas. Na análise dos monitoramentos propostos, a diversidade, as informações intrínsecas às espécies e a paisagem, a fitossociologia e as métricas da copa, se expressaram os indicadores mais recomendados para avaliação do processo restaurativo, e sugerem 74 espécies para uso nos projetos. Ademais, é necessário incentivar que as produções científicas sobre a temática contemplem também as regiões centro-oeste e nordeste, os levantamentos da fauna, bem como a descrição detalhada sobre a implantação do projeto de restauração ecológica.

show abstract

“…Passive restoration monitoring in AF areas is a poorly studied topic (e.g. Ferracin et al 2013; Cielo‐Filho & de Souza 2016). The same goes for areas which need to be restored within exotic tree plantation landscapes (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Passive restoration in Araucaria Forest: useful ecological indicators in monitoring successional advancement in exotic tree plantation landscapes

Stedille

Gomes

Costa

et al. 2020

Restoration Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Monitoring successional advancement is a complex field involving a constant search for applied ecological indicators which facilitate monitoring of secondary forests for both active and passive restoration. In this study, the authors investigate the successional advancement of floristics and tree structure within Araucaria Forest (AF) fragments under passive restoration in a context where exotic tree plantations (mainly Pinus L. genus) dominate the landscape. The ecological indicators used were floristic dissimilarity (β-diversity inferences), indicator species, ecological groups of species, basal area, and species abundance distribution (SAD) models (α-diversity inferences). A total of 182 tree species belonging to 91 genera and 43 botanical families were identified. A high β diversity was verified for which each site has indicator species (for the locations CD-Dicksonia sellowiana; CO-Cryptocarya aschersoniana; and PG-Pinus taeda), where pioneer species contributed to much of the abundance. Different SAD models are useful for describing passive restoration sites in exotic tree plantation landscapes, namely Lognormal, Mandelbrot, and Zipf. SAD models together with basal area, taxonomic group (e.g. Myrtaceae assemblage), and tree abundance in ecological groups are strategic ecological indicators for monitoring successional advancement in AF.

show abstract

AVALIAÇÃO DA RESTAURAÇÃO PASSIVA DE UMA ÁREA DE MATA ATLÂNTICA APÓS O CORTE RASO DE UMA PLANTAÇÃO DE <i>Cupressus lusitanica </i>MILL

Cited by 32 publications

References 14 publications

Forest recovery by direct seeding on the southern edge of the Brazilian Amazon

Forest recovery by direct seeding on the southern edge of the Brazilian Amazon

Espécies, práticas silviculturais e monitoramento: estratégias para restauração ecológica de áreas protegidas da Mata Atlântica

Passive restoration in Araucaria Forest: useful ecological indicators in monitoring successional advancement in exotic tree plantation landscapes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About