2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.095501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avalanche Size Scaling in Sheared Three-Dimensional Amorphous Solid

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
86
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(51 reference statements)
9
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following previous works in the field [38,40,42,44,58] we probed the statistics of the plastic flow events by determining the probability distributions of the flow events' shear-stress drops and energy changes, as well as the strain intervals between consecutive flow events [Figs. 1(b) and 1(c)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following previous works in the field [38,40,42,44,58] we probed the statistics of the plastic flow events by determining the probability distributions of the flow events' shear-stress drops and energy changes, as well as the strain intervals between consecutive flow events [Figs. 1(b) and 1(c)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated inter-zone elastic couplings should be responsible for the "autocatalytic avalanches" [5,12] or flip cascades [4,13] constituting the system-size dependent plastic events, which we believe to be precisely the non-permanent shear bands invoked in ref. [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the effects of MG sample size in the micrometer to nanometer regime on mechanical response can provide insight into this fundamental issue and guide the practical design of incorporating small-volume MG into microelectromechanical devices. 5 A number of theoretical 6,7 and experimental [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] studies have demonstrated that for sample dimensions at the micrometer scale shear banding is still the dominant deformation mechanism. [9][10][11] What happens at even smaller sample sizes (diameter D on submicrometer to nanometer scale) remains controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%