Availability of validated instruments for the study of religiousness in Brazilian samples

Abstract

Carvalho AF, et al. / Rev Psiq Clín. 2012;39(6):208 Brazil is a country of continental dimensions and its plural cultural matrix reflects on diverse religious practices. In fact, a population survey indicates that more than 80% of Brazilian people attribute an important meaning for religion 2 . Most studies clearly indicate that religiousness has an independent protector effect for physical and mental health 3 . The last two decades mark an explosion in studies addressing the relationships between religiousness and mental health 4 . Nevertheless, there is a predominance of investigations derived from North American samples (mainly Protestant) 5 . In Brazil, the study of the influence of religiousness on mental health is still in its infancy.Noteworthy, advances in this research field had been challenged by criticisms toward the scientific rigor and the actual validity of measuring religiousness 3 . Critics have argued that there is an extrapolation in the conclusion of many studies, where the protector effect of an aspect of religiousness are sometimes interpreted to mean the religion "in general" is positive 3 . The measurement of religiousness in health is a relatively recent scientific achievement which dates to pioneering investigations in the post-war 5,6 . King and Hunt early found that religiousness in a multidimensional construct 6 . Currently, there are over 100 instruments available to tap different religiousness dimension 3 . However, few instruments are validated for use in Brazilian samples. Lucchetti et al. developed the Duke Religiousness Index (DUREL), which is a brief instrument which measures three religiousness facets, namely: organizational religiousness (OR), non-organizational religiousness (NOR) and intrinsic religiousness (IR) 7 . The Brazilian Portuguese version of the DUREL (P-DUREL) was initially validated by Lucchetti et al. in a low-income community sample 7 . In this study, the P-DUREL had adequate internal consistency as well as convergent-discriminant validity. Posteriorly, our research group extended these observations and found adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent-discriminant validity in a two different samples (i.e., university students and psychiatric outpatients) 8 . The study by Martinez et al. 1 . validated the P-DUREL in a sample of postgraduate students. These authors found psychometric properties similar to the study by Taunay et al. Altogether, these three validation studies provide support for the use of the P-DUREL for the study of religiousness in our milieu.Despite these initial efforts, there is a need for new advances in this research field. There is just another validated instrument for the study of religiousness in Brazilian sample, namely the Intrinsic Religiousness Inventory (IRI) 9 . There are other validated instruments which measure related constructs, such as the Spiritual Well-Being Scale 10 and the Religious-Spiritual Coping scale 11 . Future studies should determine the psychometric properties of the P-DUREL in disti...

O impacto da religiosidade no enfrentamento positivo e negativo da dor em mulheres com fibromialgia

“…Escala de Religiosidade de Universidade de Duke (DUREL) -versão em português: contém cinco itens, sendo os dois primeiros relativos a Religiosidade Organizacional (RO) e Religiosidade Não Organizacional (RNO), e os três últimos se referem a Religiosidade Intrínseca (RI). A escala foi desenvolvida por Koenig et al, (1997), e apresenta estudos de validação no Brasil com diferentes populações (Taunay et al, 2012;Martinez et al, 2014). Na versão em português, o primeiro item do instrumento pergunta: "Com que frequência você vai a uma igreja, templo ou outro encontro religioso?…”

“…Considera-se que a religião é um fenômeno amplo e o Brasil é um país que exibe uma "matriz cultural caracterizada pela pluralidade", o que conjectura uma disparidade de práticas religiosas (Carvalho et al, 2012), cada vez mais diversificadas entre as tradições religiosas e as práticas ecléticas contemporâneas (Gruman, 2006). Apesar dessa disparidade, uma descrição mais objetiva da religiosidade foi descrita por Allport e Ross (1967), na qual o envolvimento religioso poderia ser compreendido em duas dimensões, nomeadas intrínseca e extrínseca.…”