2016 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icepe.2016.7781467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Availability assessment for grid-connected photovoltaic systems with energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative analysis for on-grid and hybrid connections, using an operation duration of 8.5 hours, with a probabilistic failure rate at Table 1 When connected hybrid, there is an additional failure rate charge controller 6.4 x 10 -6 , battery 11 x 10 -6 [4], and inverter. For inverters on a hybrid connection, the failure rate (e) value is 40.29 x 10 -6 [5] or 87.09 x 10 -6 (obtained from the min-cut set of the inverter grid) when using 40.29 x 10 -6 , the results for quantitative analysis for the hybrid connection: Meanwhile, when using the 87.09 x 10 -6 failure rate for the inverter, the reliability will decrease even more, but it will not be noticeable when <1 year. If the duration is increased, namely for one year, the operation duration is still the same, 8.5 hours, so t = 3102.5 with the failure rate value, the reliability becomes 97.6%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative analysis for on-grid and hybrid connections, using an operation duration of 8.5 hours, with a probabilistic failure rate at Table 1 When connected hybrid, there is an additional failure rate charge controller 6.4 x 10 -6 , battery 11 x 10 -6 [4], and inverter. For inverters on a hybrid connection, the failure rate (e) value is 40.29 x 10 -6 [5] or 87.09 x 10 -6 (obtained from the min-cut set of the inverter grid) when using 40.29 x 10 -6 , the results for quantitative analysis for the hybrid connection: Meanwhile, when using the 87.09 x 10 -6 failure rate for the inverter, the reliability will decrease even more, but it will not be noticeable when <1 year. If the duration is increased, namely for one year, the operation duration is still the same, 8.5 hours, so t = 3102.5 with the failure rate value, the reliability becomes 97.6%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability value is strongly influenced by the length of operation so that the system battery backup is essential in photovoltaic systems [5]. For this reason, it will also be analyzed when it is designed using a hybrid approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the system with 10 years of operational lifetime will be reliable by a proper design of FC converters. [7], [62], [66], [67]. According to the system-level analysis, the FC converters cannot guarantee system reliability requirements.…”
Section: A Case A: System-level Design For Reliability In a DC Pepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure and repair rates for various subassemblies of solar-PV systems[9,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%