2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Availability, addiction and alternatives: three criteria for assessing the impact of peak minerals on society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The steel stock in existing buildings and infrastructure is closely related to social production, urban metabolism, and resource conservation [10,11,43]. As with previous studies [19][20][21][22], we confirmed that time-series nighttime light imageries show good performance for estimating the in-use steel stock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The steel stock in existing buildings and infrastructure is closely related to social production, urban metabolism, and resource conservation [10,11,43]. As with previous studies [19][20][21][22], we confirmed that time-series nighttime light imageries show good performance for estimating the in-use steel stock.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Recent studies have shown that potential mineral scarcity is as significant as the much discussed issue of energy scarcity [5][6][7]. These findings point firmly in the direction of recycling, as limited resources can be used preferentially to recycle materials in order to extract much needed minerals, including critical minerals needed for future energy infrastructure Indeed, this mineral scarcity has the potential to make recycling a necessity, rather than a choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between mining and sustainable development is complex and contentious (Hamann, 2003). Discussion of mining s role in global sustainable development is ongoing (Mason et al, 2011), while at a national level debate continues in relation to the resource curse effects of natural resource abundance (Williams, 2011). At a local level ensuring host communities and indigenous groups benefit from mining, while avoiding its negative effects during and after operations, remains a key concern (Cronje & Chenga, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%