Emergent Phenomena in Atomic Nuclei From Large-Scale Modeling 2017
DOI: 10.1142/9789813146051_0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auxiliary-field Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Nuclei

Abstract: Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo methods enable the calculation of thermal and ground state properties of correlated quantum many-body systems in model spaces that are many orders of magnitude larger than those that can be treated by conventional diagonalization methods. We review recent developments and applications of these methods in nuclei using the framework of the configuration-interaction shell model. * yoram.alhassid@yale.edu 1 arXiv:1607.01870v1 [nucl-th]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches are inspired by AFMC methods developed for nuclei [103,104] in which the number of protons and neutrons are fixed; for reviews see Refs. [105][106][107]. An advantage of the canonical ensemble formulation is that it allows the computation of a pairing gap from the staggering of the energy in particle number, Eq.…”
Section: Canonical Ensemble Auxiliary-field Quantum Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are inspired by AFMC methods developed for nuclei [103,104] in which the number of protons and neutrons are fixed; for reviews see Refs. [105][106][107]. An advantage of the canonical ensemble formulation is that it allows the computation of a pairing gap from the staggering of the energy in particle number, Eq.…”
Section: Canonical Ensemble Auxiliary-field Quantum Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the isotopes that are deformed in their ground state 150,152,154 Sm, the prolate state density dominates at low excitation energies but the spherical state density exceeds it at above a certain excitation energy that becomes higher for the heavier isotopes. 6 In the well-deformed nuclei 152,154 Sm the probability of the prolate shape is close to 1 up to excitations of E x ∼ 5 MeV, while in the transitional nucleus 150 Sm it is only ∼ 0.8 up to E x ∼ 3 MeV. In the spherical nucleus 148 Sm, the spherical state density dominates at all excitation energies although the prolate shape region makes a significant contribution.…”
Section: A Saddle-point Approximationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Integrating the shape-projected state density over all shapes β, γ in the intrinsic frame should yield the total state density and can thus be compared with the total 6 We note that the exact excitation energy for which the crossing of the spherical and prolate densities occur depends on the value of β 0 used to differentiate between the spherical and deformed regions in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Sum Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finite-temperature AFMC.-The AFMC method (for a recent review, see Ref. [44]) is based on the Hubbard-Stratonovich (HS) transformation [45,46], which expresses the thermal propagator e −βĤ (β = 1/k B T is the inverse temperature T with Boltzmann constant k B ) as a path integral over external auxiliary fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%