2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c02198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auxiliary Atomic Relay Center Facilitates Enhanced Magnetic Couplings in Blatter’s Radical

Abstract: The recent accomplishments in obtaining strong ferromagnetic exchange interactions in organic diradicals have made the field quite fascinating and even more promising toward its technological applications. In this context, herein, we report a unique combination of remarkably strong ferromagnetic exchange interactions coupled with molecular rigidity, utilizing superstable Blatter's radical as a spin source. The planar analogues of the parent Blatter's radical obtained by annulation with a chalcogen coupled to n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the predicted J values for TRI dimer are −10.08, −10.53, and −6.76 meV using Noodleman’s, Yamaguchi’s, and Ruiz’s methods, respectively, in comparison to the reference value of 7.88 meV. This overestimation of J , as predicted by Noodleman’s and Yamaguchi’s approaches, has been consistently reported in the literature, particularly for organic diradical systems. Consequently, scaling factors of 0.3–0.5 have been employed to align with experimental J values. As demonstrated in Figure S26, Tables S1, S2, and , J predictions derived from Noodleman’s and Yamaguchi’s methods exhibit larger MAEs and mean relative errors (MREs) than those obtained using Ruiz’s approach. For example, with B3LYP, PBE0, and M06-2X functionals, the MAEs are 29.60, 34.43, and 21.75 meV for Noodleman’s method, 25.92, 34.62, and 21.86 meV for Yamaguchi’s method, and 13.38, 11.74, and 12.66 meV for Ruiz’s approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, the predicted J values for TRI dimer are −10.08, −10.53, and −6.76 meV using Noodleman’s, Yamaguchi’s, and Ruiz’s methods, respectively, in comparison to the reference value of 7.88 meV. This overestimation of J , as predicted by Noodleman’s and Yamaguchi’s approaches, has been consistently reported in the literature, particularly for organic diradical systems. Consequently, scaling factors of 0.3–0.5 have been employed to align with experimental J values. As demonstrated in Figure S26, Tables S1, S2, and , J predictions derived from Noodleman’s and Yamaguchi’s methods exhibit larger MAEs and mean relative errors (MREs) than those obtained using Ruiz’s approach. For example, with B3LYP, PBE0, and M06-2X functionals, the MAEs are 29.60, 34.43, and 21.75 meV for Noodleman’s method, 25.92, 34.62, and 21.86 meV for Yamaguchi’s method, and 13.38, 11.74, and 12.66 meV for Ruiz’s approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This overestimation of J, as predicted by Noodleman's and Yamaguchi's approaches, has been consistently reported in the literature, particularly for organic diradical systems. [65][66][67] Consequently, scaling factors of 0.3-0.5 have been employed to align with experimental J values. [68][69][70] As demonstrated in Figure S27, Tables S1 approach.…”
Section: Benchmark Of Broken-symmetry Dft Functionals For Triangulene...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, at least from a numerical perspective, Ruiz's method appears more suitable for extracting J from BS-DFT for these metal-free systems. [66][67][71][72] Hereafter, the detailed analysis of the functionals' performance will be grounded in the results obtained using Ruiz's approach.…”
Section: Benchmark Of Broken-symmetry Dft Functionals For Triangulene...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 There has been a recent surge in designing and synthesizing Blatter radicals, due to their remarkable air, moisture, optical and thermal stability which can be preserved for up to thirty years under ambient conditions, as well as intriguing magnetic properties, and thus their prospects as novel high spin magnetic molecules are excellent. [36][37][38][39] They were first prepared by Blatter and co-workers in 1968. 40 Over the past few years, Koutentis et al introduced various easy synthetic strategies that provide easy access to such superstable Blatter radicals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%